<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Schokman A</submitter><funding>Australian Government</funding><funding>Australian Research Council</funding><pagination>zsac156</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9548672</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>45(10)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Study objectives&lt;/h4>To systematically determine subjective and objective outcome measures used to measure the efficacy of narcolepsy interventions in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults and children and assess psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We searched bibliographical databases and clinical trial registries for narcolepsy RCTs and extracted objective and subjective outcome measures. If PROMs were used, we searched for psychometric studies conducted in a narcolepsy population using bibliographical databases and appraised using Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>In total, 80 different outcome measures were used across 100 RCTs. Epworth Sleep</pubmed_abstract><journal>Sleep</journal><pubmed_title>Evaluation of psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures frequently used in narcolepsy randomized controlled trials: a systematic review.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9548672</pmcid><funding_grant_id>ID CE200100025</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Cheung JMY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Glozier N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bin YS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kairaitis K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Naehrig D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schokman A</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Evaluation of psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures frequently used in narcolepsy randomized controlled trials: a systematic review.</name><description>&lt;h4>Study objectives&lt;/h4>To systematically determine subjective and objective outcome measures used to measure the efficacy of narcolepsy interventions in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults and children and assess psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We searched bibliographical databases and clinical trial registries for narcolepsy RCTs and extracted objective and subjective outcome measures. If PROMs were used, we searched for psychometric studies conducted in a narcolepsy population using bibliographical databases and appraised using Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>In total, 80 different outcome measures were used across 100 RCTs. Epworth Sleep</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Oct</publication><modification>2026-04-12T19:27:36.072Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T11:37:59.886Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9548672</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35797589</pubmed><doi>10.1093/sleep/zsac156</doi></cross_references></HashMap>