<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>1(2)</volume><submitter>Narang P</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>To evaluate the Advanced Vision Analyzer (AVA; Elisar Vision Technology) and to compare pointwise threshold sensitivity and functional correlation of Elisar Standard Algorithm (ESA) with the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) of the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc).&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Prospective, cross-sectional, observational case series.&lt;h4>Participants&lt;/h4>One hundred sixty eyes (85 control participants, 75 glaucoma patients) for functional assessment, 15 eyes for test-retest variability (TRV), 107 eyes for blind spot trial (45 normal eyes, 62 glaucoma eyes) were recruited consecutively. A separate group of participants was chosen for each assessment.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>All participants underwent ESA and SITA Standard 24-2 testing, and 1 eye of </pubmed_abstract><journal>Ophthalmology science</journal><pagination>100035</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9559955</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Advanced Vision Analyzer-Virtual Reality Perimeter: Device Validation, Functional Correlation and Comparison with Humphrey Field Analyzer.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9559955</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Narang P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Agarwal A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Srinivasan M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Advanced Vision Analyzer-Virtual Reality Perimeter: Device Validation, Functional Correlation and Comparison with Humphrey Field Analyzer.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>To evaluate the Advanced Vision Analyzer (AVA; Elisar Vision Technology) and to compare pointwise threshold sensitivity and functional correlation of Elisar Standard Algorithm (ESA) with the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) of the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc).&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Prospective, cross-sectional, observational case series.&lt;h4>Participants&lt;/h4>One hundred sixty eyes (85 control participants, 75 glaucoma patients) for functional assessment, 15 eyes for test-retest variability (TRV), 107 eyes for blind spot trial (45 normal eyes, 62 glaucoma eyes) were recruited consecutively. A separate group of participants was chosen for each assessment.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>All participants underwent ESA and SITA Standard 24-2 testing, and 1 eye of </description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Jun</publication><modification>2025-04-04T23:01:50.549Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T23:01:50.549Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9559955</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36249304</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.xops.2021.100035</doi></cross_references></HashMap>