<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>24(10)</volume><submitter>Kim MH</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>There has been an increasing demand for new technologies regarding infection control in hospital settings to reduce the burden of contact tracing.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>This study aimed to compare the validity of a real-time locating system (RTLS) with that of the conventional contact tracing method for identifying high-risk contact cases associated with the secondary transmission of SARS-CoV-2.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A retrospective case-control study involving in-hospital contact cases of confirmed COVID-19 patients, who were diagnosed from January 23 to March 25, 2022, was conducted at a university hospital in South Korea. Contact cases were identified using either the conventional method or the RTLS. The primary endpoint of this study was secondary transmission of SARS-CoV-2 amon</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of medical Internet research</journal><pagination>e41395</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9580994</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>The Potential Role of an Adjunctive Real-Time Locating System in Preventing Secondary Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in a Hospital Environment: Retrospective Case-Control Study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9580994</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Park YS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim MH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ryu UH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Heo SJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim YC</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The Potential Role of an Adjunctive Real-Time Locating System in Preventing Secondary Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in a Hospital Environment: Retrospective Case-Control Study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>There has been an increasing demand for new technologies regarding infection control in hospital settings to reduce the burden of contact tracing.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>This study aimed to compare the validity of a real-time locating system (RTLS) with that of the conventional contact tracing method for identifying high-risk contact cases associated with the secondary transmission of SARS-CoV-2.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A retrospective case-control study involving in-hospital contact cases of confirmed COVID-19 patients, who were diagnosed from January 23 to March 25, 2022, was conducted at a university hospital in South Korea. Contact cases were identified using either the conventional method or the RTLS. The primary endpoint of this study was secondary transmission of SARS-CoV-2 amon</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Oct</publication><modification>2025-04-04T07:11:49.257Z</modification><creation>2024-12-03T19:51:57.378Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9580994</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36197844</pubmed><doi>10.2196/41395</doi></cross_references></HashMap>