<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Niu G</submitter><funding>Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation</funding><funding>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding><pagination>858</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9604231</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>13(10)</volume><pubmed_abstract>The systematic status of the genus &lt;i>Athalia&lt;/i> and related genera is a perennial controversy in sawfly taxonomy. Several authors have hypothesized that the placement of &lt;i>Athalia&lt;/i> within the Tenthredinidae is artificial, but no studies have focused on this topic. If the hypothesis that &lt;i>Athalia&lt;/i> does not belong to Tenthredinidae can be supported, the taxonomic framework of Tenthredinoidea needs revision. We present a comprehensive phylogenomic study of Tenthredinoidae, focusing on the positions of &lt;i>Athalia&lt;/i> and related genera by sampling 80 representatives mainly of the Tenthredinoidea, including Heptamelinae and Blasticotomidae. Our phylogenetic reconstructions based on nuclear genes and mitochondrial (mt) sequences support &lt;i>Athalia&lt;/i> and related genera as a distinct clade sister to Tenthredinidae + (Cimbicidae + Diprionidae). A comparison of symphytan mitochondrial genomes reveals an innovative gene rearrangement pattern in Athaliidae, in which &lt;i>Dentathalia&lt;/i> demonstrates a more ancestral pattern than &lt;i>Athalia&lt;/i> and &lt;i>Hypsathalia&lt;/i>. The lineage specificity of mt rRNA secondary structures also provides sufficient support to consider Athaliidae as a separate family. In summary, the phylogeny and genomic structural changes unanimously support the taxonomic treatment of Athaliidae as a family and the re-establishment of &lt;i>Dentathalia&lt;/i> as a valid genus.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Insects</journal><pubmed_title>Phylogenomic Analyses of the Tenthredinoidea Support the Familial Rank of Athaliidae (Insecta, Tenthredinoidea).</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9604231</pmcid><funding_grant_id>31501885</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>31970447</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>20202BABL213044</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Wan S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wei M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dogan O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jouault C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cai C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Budak M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nel A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Niu G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Korkmaz EM</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Phylogenomic Analyses of the Tenthredinoidea Support the Familial Rank of Athaliidae (Insecta, Tenthredinoidea).</name><description>The systematic status of the genus &lt;i>Athalia&lt;/i> and related genera is a perennial controversy in sawfly taxonomy. Several authors have hypothesized that the placement of &lt;i>Athalia&lt;/i> within the Tenthredinidae is artificial, but no studies have focused on this topic. If the hypothesis that &lt;i>Athalia&lt;/i> does not belong to Tenthredinidae can be supported, the taxonomic framework of Tenthredinoidea needs revision. We present a comprehensive phylogenomic study of Tenthredinoidae, focusing on the positions of &lt;i>Athalia&lt;/i> and related genera by sampling 80 representatives mainly of the Tenthredinoidea, including Heptamelinae and Blasticotomidae. Our phylogenetic reconstructions based on nuclear genes and mitochondrial (mt) sequences support &lt;i>Athalia&lt;/i> and related genera as a distinct clade sister to Tenthredinidae + (Cimbicidae + Diprionidae). A comparison of symphytan mitochondrial genomes reveals an innovative gene rearrangement pattern in Athaliidae, in which &lt;i>Dentathalia&lt;/i> demonstrates a more ancestral pattern than &lt;i>Athalia&lt;/i> and &lt;i>Hypsathalia&lt;/i>. The lineage specificity of mt rRNA secondary structures also provides sufficient support to consider Athaliidae as a separate family. In summary, the phylogeny and genomic structural changes unanimously support the taxonomic treatment of Athaliidae as a family and the re-establishment of &lt;i>Dentathalia&lt;/i> as a valid genus.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Sep</publication><modification>2026-04-08T18:26:33.284Z</modification><creation>2025-04-19T04:21:52.845Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9604231</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36292806</pubmed><doi>10.3390/insects13100858</doi></cross_references></HashMap>