<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Hu X</submitter><funding>the 2017 Chinese Nutrition Society (CNS) Nutrition Research Foundation-DSM Research Fund</funding><funding>the Basic Scientific Research Program of Wenzhou Medical University, China</funding><funding>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding><funding>Tseng-Lien Lin Foundation, Taiwan, and Katsuzo and Kiyo Aoshima Memorial Funds, Japan</funding><funding>China Medical University Hospital, Academia Sinica Stroke Biosignature Project</funding><funding>the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan</funding><funding>MOST Clinical Trial Consortium for Stroke</funding><funding>The PhD Programs Foundation of Wenzhou Medical University, China</funding><pagination>1645</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9605069</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>12(10)</volume><pubmed_abstract>We aimed to investigate the association between either or both of benzodiazepines (BZDs) and non-BZDs and the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database. The participants with at least two prescriptions of BZDs and/or non-BZDs were identified as hypnotics users, whereas those without any prescription of hypnotics were non-hypnotics users. The hypnotics and non-hypnotics cohorts were 1:1 matched on their propensity scores. A total of 109,704 AF-free individuals were included; 610 AF cases occurred in the 54,852 hypnotics users and 166 in the 54,852 non-hypnotics users during the 602,470 person-years of follow-up, with a higher risk of new-onset AF in the users than the non-users (hazard ratio (HR): 3.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.04-4.28). The users at the highest tertiles of the estimated defined daily doses per one year (DDD) had a greater risk for AF than the non-users, with the risk increasing by 7.13-fold (95% CI: 5.86-8.67) for &amp;gt;0.74-DDD BZDs, 10.68-fold (95% CI: 6.13-18.62) for &amp;gt;4.72-DDD non-BZDs, and 3.26-fold (95% CI: 2.38-4.47) for &amp;gt; 1.65-DDD combinations of BZDs with non-BZDs, respectively. In conclusion, hypnotics use was associated with elevated incidence of AF in the Taiwanese population, which highlighted that the high-dose usage of hypnotics needs more caution in clinical cardiological practice.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of personalized medicine</journal><pubmed_title>Hypnotics Use Is Associated with Elevated Incident Atrial Fibrillation: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis of Cohort Study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9605069</pmcid><funding_grant_id>2017-008</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>the CMU107-Z-03 &amp;amp; CMU 109-S-55 from China Medical University</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>MOST 108-2321-B-039-004</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>81900737</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>MOHW108-TDU-B-212-133004</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>89217015</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>KYYW202015</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>BM10701010021</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Zhang XH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Adeniran E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lin JJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu YL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hu X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen HY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yang B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gong SQ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jong GP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lin MC</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Hypnotics Use Is Associated with Elevated Incident Atrial Fibrillation: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis of Cohort Study.</name><description>We aimed to investigate the association between either or both of benzodiazepines (BZDs) and non-BZDs and the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database. The participants with at least two prescriptions of BZDs and/or non-BZDs were identified as hypnotics users, whereas those without any prescription of hypnotics were non-hypnotics users. The hypnotics and non-hypnotics cohorts were 1:1 matched on their propensity scores. A total of 109,704 AF-free individuals were included; 610 AF cases occurred in the 54,852 hypnotics users and 166 in the 54,852 non-hypnotics users during the 602,470 person-years of follow-up, with a higher risk of new-onset AF in the users than the non-users (hazard ratio (HR): 3.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.04-4.28). The users at the highest tertiles of the estimated defined daily doses per one year (DDD) had a greater risk for AF than the non-users, with the risk increasing by 7.13-fold (95% CI: 5.86-8.67) for &amp;gt;0.74-DDD BZDs, 10.68-fold (95% CI: 6.13-18.62) for &amp;gt;4.72-DDD non-BZDs, and 3.26-fold (95% CI: 2.38-4.47) for &amp;gt; 1.65-DDD combinations of BZDs with non-BZDs, respectively. In conclusion, hypnotics use was associated with elevated incidence of AF in the Taiwanese population, which highlighted that the high-dose usage of hypnotics needs more caution in clinical cardiological practice.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Oct</publication><modification>2025-04-18T21:22:31.664Z</modification><creation>2025-04-07T09:16:12.504Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9605069</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36294784</pubmed><doi>10.3390/jpm12101645</doi></cross_references></HashMap>