<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>13</volume><submitter>Mangiulli I</submitter><pubmed_abstract>People are often exposed to fake news. Such an exposure to misleading information might lead to false memory creation. We examined whether people can form false memories for COVID-19-related fake news. Furthermore, we investigated which individual factors might predict false memory formation for fake news. In two experiments, we provided participants with two pieces of COVID-19-related fake news along with a non-probative photograph. In Experiment 1, 41% (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 66/161) of our sample reported at least one false memory for COVID-19-related fake news. In Experiment 2, even a higher percentage emerged (54.9%; &lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 185/337). Moreover, in Experiment 2, participants with conspiracy beliefs were more likely to report false memories for fake news than those without such beliefs, irrespec</pubmed_abstract><journal>Frontiers in psychology</journal><pagination>972004</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9608342</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>False memory and COVID-19: How people fall for fake news about COVID-19 in digital contexts.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9608342</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Mangiulli I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Battista F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Coveliers E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Webster TC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Curci A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kafi NA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Otgaar H</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>False memory and COVID-19: How people fall for fake news about COVID-19 in digital contexts.</name><description>People are often exposed to fake news. Such an exposure to misleading information might lead to false memory creation. We examined whether people can form false memories for COVID-19-related fake news. Furthermore, we investigated which individual factors might predict false memory formation for fake news. In two experiments, we provided participants with two pieces of COVID-19-related fake news along with a non-probative photograph. In Experiment 1, 41% (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 66/161) of our sample reported at least one false memory for COVID-19-related fake news. In Experiment 2, even a higher percentage emerged (54.9%; &lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 185/337). Moreover, in Experiment 2, participants with conspiracy beliefs were more likely to report false memories for fake news than those without such beliefs, irrespec</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022</publication><modification>2025-04-04T09:41:51.464Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T09:41:51.464Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9608342</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36312068</pubmed><doi>10.3389/fpsyg.2022.972004</doi></cross_references></HashMap>