<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>14</volume><submitter>Han W</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The surrogacy of progression-free survival (PFS) for overall survival (OS) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unelucidated. This study aimed to determine the validity of PFS as a surrogate endpoint for OS in ESCC patients treated with definitive radiotherapy or definitive chemoradiotherapy (dRT/dCRT), as well as characterize the prognostic factors and survival of such patients.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A total of 3662 patients from 10 cancer centers were enrolled. One-, 2-, and 3-year PFS (PFS12, PFS24, and PSF36, respectively) were used as time points for analysis. At each time point, ESCC-specific mortality and OS were characterized using competing risk and conditional survival models, while correlation between PFS and OS was evaluated by linear regression.&lt;h4></pubmed_abstract><journal>Therapeutic advances in medical oncology</journal><pagination>17588359221131526</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9619262</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Progression-free survival as surrogate endpoint of overall survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a real-world data and literature-based analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9619262</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Zhang K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Han W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Deng L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bi N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhao Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liang J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Deng W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xiao Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sun X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chang X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhou Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lv J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Qiao X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pang Q</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ni W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Han C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Feng Q</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhu S</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Progression-free survival as surrogate endpoint of overall survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a real-world data and literature-based analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The surrogacy of progression-free survival (PFS) for overall survival (OS) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unelucidated. This study aimed to determine the validity of PFS as a surrogate endpoint for OS in ESCC patients treated with definitive radiotherapy or definitive chemoradiotherapy (dRT/dCRT), as well as characterize the prognostic factors and survival of such patients.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A total of 3662 patients from 10 cancer centers were enrolled. One-, 2-, and 3-year PFS (PFS12, PFS24, and PSF36, respectively) were used as time points for analysis. At each time point, ESCC-specific mortality and OS were characterized using competing risk and conditional survival models, while correlation between PFS and OS was evaluated by linear regression.&lt;h4></description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022</publication><modification>2025-04-05T13:27:36.307Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T13:27:36.307Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9619262</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36324733</pubmed><doi>10.1177/17588359221131526</doi></cross_references></HashMap>