<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><submitter>Llor C</submitter><funding>Instituto de Salud Carlos III</funding><funding>Ministry of Science and Innovation</funding><funding>Spanish Clinical Research Network</funding><funding>Government of Spain</funding><funding>European Regional Development Fund</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Despite the frequent use of symptomatic therapies in cough, evidence of their benefits is lacking.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>We compared the effectiveness of 3 symptomatic therapies and usual care in acute bronchitis.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Multicenter, pragmatic, multiarm parallel group, open randomized trial in primary care (ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT03738917) was conducted in Catalonia. Patients ≥18 with uncomplicated acute bronchitis, with cough&lt;3 weeks as the main symptom, scoring ≥4 in either daytime or nocturnal cough (7-point Likert scale), were randomized to usual care, dextromethorphan 15 mg t.i.d., ipratropium bromide inhaler 20 µg 2 puffs t.i.d, or 30 mg of honey t.i.d., all taken for up to 14 days. The main outcome measure was the number of days with moderate-to-severe cough. A symptom diary was given. A second visit was scheduled at days 2-3 for assessing evolution, with 2 more visits at days 15 and 29 for clinical assessment, evaluation of adverse effects, re-attendance, and complications.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>We failed to achieve the sample size scheduled due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We finally recruited 194 patients. The median number of days with moderate-to-severe cough (score ≥ 3) in the usual care arm was 5 (interquartile range [IQR], 4, 8.75), 5 in the ipratropium bromide arm (IQR, 3, 8), 5 in the dextromethorphan arm (IQR, 4, 9.75), and 6 in the honey arm (IQR, 3.5, 7). The same results were obtained in the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for the median survival time of each arm with the usual care as the reference group.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>The symptomatic treatment evaluated has shown to be ineffective against cough.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Family practice</journal><pagination>cmac112</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9619792</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Effectiveness of antitussives, anticholinergics, and honey versus usual care in adults with uncomplicated acute bronchitis: a multiarm randomized clinical trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9619792</pmcid><funding_grant_id>PI17/01345</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>PT17/0017/0005</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Llor C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Garcia-Sangenis A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moragas A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pera H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ouchi D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gomez-Lumbreras A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Morros R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Monfa R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pujol J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Effectiveness of antitussives, anticholinergics, and honey versus usual care in adults with uncomplicated acute bronchitis: a multiarm randomized clinical trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Despite the frequent use of symptomatic therapies in cough, evidence of their benefits is lacking.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>We compared the effectiveness of 3 symptomatic therapies and usual care in acute bronchitis.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Multicenter, pragmatic, multiarm parallel group, open randomized trial in primary care (ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT03738917) was conducted in Catalonia. Patients ≥18 with uncomplicated acute bronchitis, with cough&lt;3 weeks as the main symptom, scoring ≥4 in either daytime or nocturnal cough (7-point Likert scale), were randomized to usual care, dextromethorphan 15 mg t.i.d., ipratropium bromide inhaler 20 µg 2 puffs t.i.d, or 30 mg of honey t.i.d., all taken for up to 14 days. The main outcome measure was the number of days with moderate-to-severe cough. A symptom diary was given. A second visit was scheduled at days 2-3 for assessing evolution, with 2 more visits at days 15 and 29 for clinical assessment, evaluation of adverse effects, re-attendance, and complications.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>We failed to achieve the sample size scheduled due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We finally recruited 194 patients. The median number of days with moderate-to-severe cough (score ≥ 3) in the usual care arm was 5 (interquartile range [IQR], 4, 8.75), 5 in the ipratropium bromide arm (IQR, 3, 8), 5 in the dextromethorphan arm (IQR, 4, 9.75), and 6 in the honey arm (IQR, 3.5, 7). The same results were obtained in the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for the median survival time of each arm with the usual care as the reference group.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>The symptomatic treatment evaluated has shown to be ineffective against cough.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Oct</publication><modification>2024-11-08T16:06:06.85Z</modification><creation>2024-11-08T16:06:06.85Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9619792</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36239199</pubmed><doi>10.1093/fampra/cmac112</doi></cross_references></HashMap>