<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Oehri J</submitter><funding>Swiss National Science Foundation</funding><funding>European Commission</funding><pagination>6379</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9622844</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>13(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Despite the importance of high-latitude surface energy budgets (SEBs) for land-climate interactions in the rapidly changing Arctic, uncertainties in their prediction persist. Here, we harmonize SEB observations across a network of vegetated and glaciated sites at circumpolar scale (1994-2021). Our variance-partitioning analysis identifies vegetation type as an important predictor for SEB-components during Arctic summer (June-August), compared to other SEB-drivers including climate, latitude and permafrost characteristics. Differences among vegetation types can be of similar magnitude as between vegetation and glacier surfaces and are especially high for summer sensible and latent heat fluxes. The timing of SEB-flux summer-regimes (when daily mean values exceed 0 Wm&lt;sup>-2&lt;/sup>) relative t</pubmed_abstract><journal>Nature communications</journal><pubmed_title>Vegetation type is an important predictor of the arctic summer land surface energy budget.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9622844</pmcid><funding_grant_id>RIA #869471</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>184131</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>178753</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>193907</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Grysko R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Muscari G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dean JF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kejna M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stone RS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Oehri J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Runkle BRK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Reji Chacko M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Riihimaki LD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Olofsson J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schuur EAG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Parmentier FW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Beringer J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wille C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Te Beest M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gockede M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kalhori A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Plekhanova E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Boike J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rocha AV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Riihela A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim JS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Steffen K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Harding RJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>di Sarra A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Domine F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gamon JA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kropp H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cox CJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zemlianskii V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Metzger S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pirk N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Grachev AA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Friborg T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sonnentag O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Euskirchen ES</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Boer G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Essery R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van As D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hakuba MZ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Morris S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sullivan RC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Edgar CW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ohmura A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Williamson SN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bret-Harte MS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lopez-Blanco E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Holl D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McFadden JP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stoy PC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hansen B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ueyama M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Quinton WL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Frost GV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schaepman-Strub G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Putkonen J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chambers SD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Grunberg I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kutzbach L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Miller NB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Iwata H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mastepanov M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Meloni D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Blanken PD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Atchley AL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wild M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Karger DN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fausto RS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Christensen TR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sachs T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sobota I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lepparanta M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jackowicz-Korczynski M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vandecrux B</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Vegetation type is an important predictor of the arctic summer land surface energy budget.</name><description>Despite the importance of high-latitude surface energy budgets (SEBs) for land-climate interactions in the rapidly changing Arctic, uncertainties in their prediction persist. Here, we harmonize SEB observations across a network of vegetated and glaciated sites at circumpolar scale (1994-2021). Our variance-partitioning analysis identifies vegetation type as an important predictor for SEB-components during Arctic summer (June-August), compared to other SEB-drivers including climate, latitude and permafrost characteristics. Differences among vegetation types can be of similar magnitude as between vegetation and glacier surfaces and are especially high for summer sensible and latent heat fluxes. The timing of SEB-flux summer-regimes (when daily mean values exceed 0 Wm&lt;sup>-2&lt;/sup>) relative t</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Oct</publication><modification>2026-05-27T20:39:54.604Z</modification><creation>2025-04-21T14:13:43.558Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9622844</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36316310</pubmed><doi>10.1038/s41467-022-34049-3</doi></cross_references></HashMap>