<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>12(10)</volume><submitter>Miller KC</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR T) are groundbreaking therapies but may cause significant toxicities including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and cytopenias. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is often used to mitigate neutropenia after CAR T, but there is no consensus recommended strategy due to hypothesized, but largely unknown risks of exacerbating toxicities. To investigate the impact of G-CSF, we retrospectively analyzed 197 patients treated with anti-CD19 CAR T for lymphoma and 47 patients treated with anti-BCMA CAR T for multiple myeloma. In lymphoma, 140 patients (71%) received prophylactic G-CSF before CAR T (mostly pegylated G-CSF) and were compared with 57 patients (29%) treated with G-CSF after CAR T or not exposed. Prophylactic G-CSF was associated with faster neutrophil recovery (3 vs. 4 days, P &lt; 0.01) but did not reduce recurrent neutropenia later. Prophylactic G-CSF was associated with increased grade ≥2 CRS (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.11-4.18, P = 0.02), but not ICANS. In multiple myeloma, prophylactic G-CSF was not used; patients were stratified by early G-CSF exposure (≤2 days vs. ≥3 days after CAR T or no exposure), with no significant difference in toxicities. Future trials should clarify the optimal G-CSF strategy to improve outcomes after CAR T.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Blood cancer journal</journal><pagination>146</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9622902</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on toxicities after CAR T cell therapy for lymphoma and myeloma.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9622902</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Raje NS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Branagan AR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Frigault MJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Johnson PC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>O'Donnell EK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Soumerai JD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Abramson JS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Saucier A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yee AJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jacobson CA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Miller KC</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on toxicities after CAR T cell therapy for lymphoma and myeloma.</name><description>Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR T) are groundbreaking therapies but may cause significant toxicities including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and cytopenias. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is often used to mitigate neutropenia after CAR T, but there is no consensus recommended strategy due to hypothesized, but largely unknown risks of exacerbating toxicities. To investigate the impact of G-CSF, we retrospectively analyzed 197 patients treated with anti-CD19 CAR T for lymphoma and 47 patients treated with anti-BCMA CAR T for multiple myeloma. In lymphoma, 140 patients (71%) received prophylactic G-CSF before CAR T (mostly pegylated G-CSF) and were compared with 57 patients (29%) treated with G-CSF after CAR T or not exposed. Prophylactic G-CSF was associated with faster neutrophil recovery (3 vs. 4 days, P &lt; 0.01) but did not reduce recurrent neutropenia later. Prophylactic G-CSF was associated with increased grade ≥2 CRS (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.11-4.18, P = 0.02), but not ICANS. In multiple myeloma, prophylactic G-CSF was not used; patients were stratified by early G-CSF exposure (≤2 days vs. ≥3 days after CAR T or no exposure), with no significant difference in toxicities. Future trials should clarify the optimal G-CSF strategy to improve outcomes after CAR T.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Nov</publication><modification>2026-05-03T10:54:00.288Z</modification><creation>2025-04-19T02:37:30.75Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9622902</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36316312</pubmed><doi>10.1038/s41408-022-00741-2</doi></cross_references></HashMap>