<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Dumelle M</submitter><funding>U.S. Environmental Protection Agency</funding><funding>Intramural EPA</funding><funding>National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration</funding><pagination>2018-2029</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9628259</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>13(9)</volume><pubmed_abstract>The design-based and model-based approaches to frequentist statistical inference rest on fundamentally different foundations. In the design-based approach, inference relies on random sampling. In the model-based approach, inference relies on distributional assumptions. We compare the approaches in a finite population spatial context.We provide relevant background for the design-based and model-based approaches and then study their performance using simulated data and real data. The real data is from the United States Environmental Protection Agency's 2012 National Lakes Assessment. A variety of sample sizes, location layouts, dependence structures, and response types are considered. The population mean is the parameter of interest, and performance is measured using statistics like bias, sq</pubmed_abstract><journal>Methods in ecology and evolution</journal><pubmed_title>A comparison of design-based and model-based approaches for finite population spatial sampling and inference.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9628259</pmcid><funding_grant_id>EPA999999</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Dumelle M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hoef JMV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Higham M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Madsen L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Olsen AR</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>A comparison of design-based and model-based approaches for finite population spatial sampling and inference.</name><description>The design-based and model-based approaches to frequentist statistical inference rest on fundamentally different foundations. In the design-based approach, inference relies on random sampling. In the model-based approach, inference relies on distributional assumptions. We compare the approaches in a finite population spatial context.We provide relevant background for the design-based and model-based approaches and then study their performance using simulated data and real data. The real data is from the United States Environmental Protection Agency's 2012 National Lakes Assessment. A variety of sample sizes, location layouts, dependence structures, and response types are considered. The population mean is the parameter of interest, and performance is measured using statistics like bias, sq</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Sep</publication><modification>2025-04-04T20:04:23.597Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T20:04:23.597Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9628259</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36340863</pubmed><doi>10.1111/2041-210x.13919</doi><doi>10.1111/2041-210X.13919</doi></cross_references></HashMap>