<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>11(21)</volume><submitter>Tan D</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Background: Many studies explored the prognostic value of the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) in urothelial carcinoma (UC), but the results are controversial. This study aimed to quantify the relationship between pretreatment mGPS and survival in patients with UC. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science to identify eligible studies published before August 2022. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the association between pretreatment mGPS and the prognosis of UC. Results: Thirteen eligible studies involving 12,524 patients were included. A high mGPS was significantly associated with poor overall survival (mGPS 1/0: HR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.12−1.58, p = 0.001; mGPS 2/0: HR = 2.02, 95% CI</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of clinical medicine</journal><pagination>6261</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9655933</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Prognostic Utility of the Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score in Urothelial Carcinoma: Outcomes from a Pooled Analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9655933</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Jiang J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lin T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wei Q</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tan D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xiong Q</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tan P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang P</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Prognostic Utility of the Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score in Urothelial Carcinoma: Outcomes from a Pooled Analysis.</name><description>Background: Many studies explored the prognostic value of the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) in urothelial carcinoma (UC), but the results are controversial. This study aimed to quantify the relationship between pretreatment mGPS and survival in patients with UC. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science to identify eligible studies published before August 2022. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the association between pretreatment mGPS and the prognosis of UC. Results: Thirteen eligible studies involving 12,524 patients were included. A high mGPS was significantly associated with poor overall survival (mGPS 1/0: HR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.12−1.58, p = 0.001; mGPS 2/0: HR = 2.02, 95% CI</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Oct</publication><modification>2025-04-05T15:42:09.379Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T15:42:09.379Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9655933</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36362488</pubmed><doi>10.3390/jcm11216261</doi></cross_references></HashMap>