<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Guo Y</submitter><funding>Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province</funding><funding>Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities</funding><funding>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding><pagination>6229</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9656945</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>11(21)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (RALUR) and trans-umbilical multiport laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (TMLUR) are both minimally invasive procedures for benign distal ureteral stricture (DUS). However, TMLUR has rarely been reported in published research, thus the difference in mid-term outcome of these two procedures warrants investigation.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Patients who underwent RALUR or TMLUR for pediatric DUS from April 2017 to November 2020 at our institution were retrospectively analyzed and 56 patients were included in this retrospective comparison. Demographic characteristics, perioperative data and follow-up results were collected and analyzed in RALUR and TALUR groups.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>RALUR and TMLUR were successfully performed in children </pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of clinical medicine</journal><pubmed_title>Robot-Assisted versus Trans-Umbilical Multiport Laparoscopic Ureteral Reimplantation for Pediatric Benign Distal Ureteral Stricture: Mid-Term Results at a Single Center.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9656945</pmcid><funding_grant_id>2014CFA012</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>81272779, 81372667, 81472363, 81402301, 81402408, 81572423, 81672500, 81773094, 81772967, 81874085, 81874066, 81802925, 81903011, 81903008, 82072801, 82173316</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>2019kfyRCPY032, 2012QN224, 2013ZHYX003, 01-18-530112, 01-18-530115</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Jin H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tong Q</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guo Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mei H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zheng L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Du X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li Q</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hu A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cheng Y</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Robot-Assisted versus Trans-Umbilical Multiport Laparoscopic Ureteral Reimplantation for Pediatric Benign Distal Ureteral Stricture: Mid-Term Results at a Single Center.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (RALUR) and trans-umbilical multiport laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (TMLUR) are both minimally invasive procedures for benign distal ureteral stricture (DUS). However, TMLUR has rarely been reported in published research, thus the difference in mid-term outcome of these two procedures warrants investigation.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Patients who underwent RALUR or TMLUR for pediatric DUS from April 2017 to November 2020 at our institution were retrospectively analyzed and 56 patients were included in this retrospective comparison. Demographic characteristics, perioperative data and follow-up results were collected and analyzed in RALUR and TALUR groups.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>RALUR and TMLUR were successfully performed in children </description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Oct</publication><modification>2025-04-06T00:22:12.825Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T00:22:12.825Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9656945</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36362458</pubmed><doi>10.3390/jcm11216229</doi></cross_references></HashMap>