<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Zeng J</submitter><funding>Foshan Science and Technology Innovation</funding><funding>Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province</funding><funding>National Science Fund for Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding><funding>Distinguished Young Scholars of China</funding><funding>This research was funded by the National Key R&amp;amp;D Program of China</funding><pagination>3489</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9658760</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>11(21)</volume><pubmed_abstract>The processing technique is one of the key factors affecting the quality of camellia oil. In this study, camellia oils were obtained using four different processing techniques (cold-pressed, roast-pressed, fresh-pressed, and refined), and their triacylglycerols (TAGs) profile, bioactive compound (tocopherols, sterols, squalene, and polyphenols) level, oxidative stability, and volatile compounds were analyzed and compared. To further identify characteristic components in four camellia oil products, the TAG profile was analyzed using UPLC-QTOF-MS&lt;sup>E&lt;/sup>. Five characteristic markers were identified, including OOO (&lt;i>m/z&lt;/i> 902.8151), POL (&lt;i>m/z&lt;/i> 874.7850), SOO (&lt;i>m/z&lt;/i> 904.8296), PPL (&lt;i>m/z&lt;/i> 848.7693), PPS (&lt;i>m/z&lt;/i> 852.7987). Regarding the bioactive compound level and ant</pubmed_abstract><journal>Foods (Basel, Switzerland)</journal><pubmed_title>Typical Characterization of Commercial Camellia Oil Products Using Different Processing Techniques: Triacylglycerol Profile, Bioactive Compounds, Oxidative Stability, Antioxidant Activity and Volatile Compounds.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9658760</pmcid><funding_grant_id>31930084</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>31725022</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>2019YFD1002403</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>2019A050503002</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>FS0AA-KJ919-4402-0013</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Liu X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lan D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xu Q</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zeng J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Qi S</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Typical Characterization of Commercial Camellia Oil Products Using Different Processing Techniques: Triacylglycerol Profile, Bioactive Compounds, Oxidative Stability, Antioxidant Activity and Volatile Compounds.</name><description>The processing technique is one of the key factors affecting the quality of camellia oil. In this study, camellia oils were obtained using four different processing techniques (cold-pressed, roast-pressed, fresh-pressed, and refined), and their triacylglycerols (TAGs) profile, bioactive compound (tocopherols, sterols, squalene, and polyphenols) level, oxidative stability, and volatile compounds were analyzed and compared. To further identify characteristic components in four camellia oil products, the TAG profile was analyzed using UPLC-QTOF-MS&lt;sup>E&lt;/sup>. Five characteristic markers were identified, including OOO (&lt;i>m/z&lt;/i> 902.8151), POL (&lt;i>m/z&lt;/i> 874.7850), SOO (&lt;i>m/z&lt;/i> 904.8296), PPL (&lt;i>m/z&lt;/i> 848.7693), PPS (&lt;i>m/z&lt;/i> 852.7987). Regarding the bioactive compound level and ant</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Nov</publication><modification>2025-04-22T12:34:14.741Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T00:24:01.153Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9658760</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36360102</pubmed><doi>10.3390/foods11213489</doi></cross_references></HashMap>