{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["17(11)"],"submitter":["Byrne AK"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background</h4>Medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) account for 3-50% of all General Practitioner (GP) consultations and are difficult to diagnose due to their unknown aetiology, symptom overlap between conditions, and lack of effective treatment options. MUS patients' and primary care clinicians frequently face challenges during consultations, with GPs reporting difficulty identifying and classifying MUS, whilst patients report stigma and feeling illegitimised by clinicians. Communication interventions have been proposed as a method to facilitate the doctor-patient relationship and aid the management of MUS.<h4>Aim</h4>This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of primary care based communication interventions at improving MUS patients' and/or clinician outcomes.<h4>Met"],"journal":["PloS one"],"pagination":["e0277538"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9662736"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Communication interventions for medically unexplained symptom conditions in general practice: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials."],"pmcid":["PMC9662736"],"pubmed_authors":["Doherty L","Jones K","Scantlebury A","Torgerson DJ","Byrne AK"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Communication interventions for medically unexplained symptom conditions in general practice: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.","description":"<h4>Background</h4>Medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) account for 3-50% of all General Practitioner (GP) consultations and are difficult to diagnose due to their unknown aetiology, symptom overlap between conditions, and lack of effective treatment options. MUS patients' and primary care clinicians frequently face challenges during consultations, with GPs reporting difficulty identifying and classifying MUS, whilst patients report stigma and feeling illegitimised by clinicians. Communication interventions have been proposed as a method to facilitate the doctor-patient relationship and aid the management of MUS.<h4>Aim</h4>This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of primary care based communication interventions at improving MUS patients' and/or clinician outcomes.<h4>Met","dates":{"release":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2022","modification":"2026-03-15T11:16:40.459Z","creation":"2025-04-06T02:38:22.207Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC9662736","cross_references":{"pubmed":["36374916"],"doi":["10.1371/journal.pone.0277538"]}}