<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Zhou Y</submitter><funding>Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy</funding><funding>NIAID NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute</funding><funding>NHLBI NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Cancer Institute</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><funding>University of Texas MD Anderson</funding><funding>Wilks Family Fund</funding><funding>Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas</funding><pagination>e20221333</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9664499</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>220(2)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has revolutionized cancer treatment, yet quality of life and continuation of therapy can be constrained by immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Limited understanding of irAE mechanisms hampers development of approaches to mitigate their damage. To address this, we examined whether mice gained sensitivity to anti-CTLA-4 (αCTLA-4)-mediated toxicity upon disruption of gut homeostatic immunity. We found αCTLA-4 drove increased inflammation and colonic tissue damage in mice with genetic predisposition to intestinal inflammation, acute gastrointestinal infection, transplantation with a dysbiotic fecal microbiome, or dextran sodium sulfate administration. We identified an immune signature of αCTLA-4-mediated irAEs, including colonic neutrophil accumulation and s</pubmed_abstract><journal>The Journal of experimental medicine</journal><pubmed_title>Intestinal toxicity to CTLA-4 blockade driven by IL-6 and myeloid infiltration.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9664499</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R01 AI133822</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 CA221703</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30CA016672</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01AI109294</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CA016672</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30CA0166722</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HL158796</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 CA008748</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>RP170067</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32 CA009599</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>RP210028</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>3R01CA187076-05S1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CA009599</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01AI109294-04S1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 CA016672</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>HL158796</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01AI133822</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>RR190017</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50CA221703</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AI109294</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 CA187076</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Kahn LM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wong MC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mishra AK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Peng W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Foo WC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Peterson CB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Patel B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Whitley EM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gubin MM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cass SH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Park EM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wargo JA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wani K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Joon AY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Arora R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cogdill AP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Johnson SB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ledesma DA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Diehl GE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Diab A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zamler DB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pineda JE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tang X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wadud Khan MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Allison JP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Watowich SS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Raso MG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schneider S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Babcock RL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dyevoich AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Johnson DH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chrisikos TT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhou Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Clise-Dwyer K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li HS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tetzlaff MT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Medik YB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chapman T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hudgens CW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hwu P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ajami NJ</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Intestinal toxicity to CTLA-4 blockade driven by IL-6 and myeloid infiltration.</name><description>Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has revolutionized cancer treatment, yet quality of life and continuation of therapy can be constrained by immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Limited understanding of irAE mechanisms hampers development of approaches to mitigate their damage. To address this, we examined whether mice gained sensitivity to anti-CTLA-4 (αCTLA-4)-mediated toxicity upon disruption of gut homeostatic immunity. We found αCTLA-4 drove increased inflammation and colonic tissue damage in mice with genetic predisposition to intestinal inflammation, acute gastrointestinal infection, transplantation with a dysbiotic fecal microbiome, or dextran sodium sulfate administration. We identified an immune signature of αCTLA-4-mediated irAEs, including colonic neutrophil accumulation and s</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Feb</publication><modification>2025-04-22T07:47:30.37Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T22:15:53.069Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9664499</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36367776</pubmed><doi>10.1084/jem.20221333</doi></cross_references></HashMap>