<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Malhotra A</submitter><funding>NHLBI NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute</funding><pagination>76</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9670396</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>17(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Historically, the focus of cost-effectiveness analyses has been on the costs to operate and deliver interventions after their initial design and launch. The costs related to design and implementation of interventions have often been omitted. Ignoring these costs leads to an underestimation of the true price of interventions and biases economic analyses toward favoring new interventions. This is especially true in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where implementation may require substantial up-front investment. This scoping review was conducted to explore the topics, depth, and availability of scientific literature on integrating implementation science into economic evaluations of health interventions in LMICs.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We searched Web of Science and PubMed</pubmed_abstract><journal>Implementation science : IS</journal><pubmed_title>Economic evaluation of implementation science outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9670396</pmcid><funding_grant_id>UG3 HL154499</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>1UG3HL154501-01</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG3 HL156390</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>1UG3HL156390-01</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>1UG3HL156389-01</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>1UG3HL154499-01</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>1UG3HL156388-01</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U24 HL154426</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG3 HL156388</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>1U24HL154426-01</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG3 HL156389</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG3 HL154501</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Kagoya F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Barker A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hutchinson B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Effah W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sohn H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Malhotra A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Masiye F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Watkins D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mbewe P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mosepele M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sambo J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cameron DB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Newsome B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Phiri J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Davila-Roman VG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Laxy M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thompson RR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dowdy DW</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Economic evaluation of implementation science outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Historically, the focus of cost-effectiveness analyses has been on the costs to operate and deliver interventions after their initial design and launch. The costs related to design and implementation of interventions have often been omitted. Ignoring these costs leads to an underestimation of the true price of interventions and biases economic analyses toward favoring new interventions. This is especially true in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where implementation may require substantial up-front investment. This scoping review was conducted to explore the topics, depth, and availability of scientific literature on integrating implementation science into economic evaluations of health interventions in LMICs.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We searched Web of Science and PubMed</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Nov</publication><modification>2025-04-19T06:38:07.776Z</modification><creation>2025-04-19T06:38:07.776Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9670396</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36384807</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s13012-022-01248-x</doi></cross_references></HashMap>