<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>12(11)</volume><submitter>Tringale M</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>To identify and thematically analyse how healthcare professionals (HCPs) integrate patient values and preferences ('values integration') in primary care for adults with non-communicable diseases (NCDs).&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Systematic review and meta-aggregation methods were used for extraction, synthesis and analysis of qualitative evidence.&lt;h4>Data sources&lt;/h4>Relevant records were sourced using keywords to search 12 databases (ASSIA, CINAHL, DARE, EMBASE, ERIC, Google Scholar, GreyLit, Ovid-MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed-MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science).&lt;h4>Eligibility criteria&lt;/h4>Records needed to be published between 2000 and 2020 and report qualitative methods and findings in English involving HCP participants regarding primary care for adult patients.&lt;h4>Data extraction a</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMJ open</journal><pagination>e067268</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9677014</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Integrating patient values and preferences in healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9677014</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Boylan AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stephen G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tringale M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Heneghan C</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Integrating patient values and preferences in healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>To identify and thematically analyse how healthcare professionals (HCPs) integrate patient values and preferences ('values integration') in primary care for adults with non-communicable diseases (NCDs).&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Systematic review and meta-aggregation methods were used for extraction, synthesis and analysis of qualitative evidence.&lt;h4>Data sources&lt;/h4>Relevant records were sourced using keywords to search 12 databases (ASSIA, CINAHL, DARE, EMBASE, ERIC, Google Scholar, GreyLit, Ovid-MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed-MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science).&lt;h4>Eligibility criteria&lt;/h4>Records needed to be published between 2000 and 2020 and report qualitative methods and findings in English involving HCP participants regarding primary care for adult patients.&lt;h4>Data extraction a</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Nov</publication><modification>2025-04-05T10:57:29.413Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T10:57:29.413Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9677014</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36400731</pubmed><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067268</doi></cross_references></HashMap>