{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["McIsaac DI"],"funding":["The Canadian Institutes of Health Research"],"pagination":["e068797"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9677017"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["12(11)"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Introduction</h4>Prehabilitation is a high-priority intervention for patients, the public, clinicians and health systems. However, existing knowledge syntheses are generally low quality and do not provide insights regarding the relative efficacy of different prehabilitation components (eg, exercise, nutrition, psychosocial or cognitive interventions). The objective of the planned review is to evaluate the relative efficacy of different prehabilitation components to inform current care, implementation and future research.<h4>Methods and analysis</h4>We will perform a systematic review and component network meta-analysis (CNMA). We will use a peer-reviewed search strategy to identify all randomised trials of prehabilitation in adult surgical patients from Ovid Medline, Embase, the CINAHL"],"journal":["BMJ open"],"pubmed_title":["Identifying relative efficacy of components of prehabilitation in adult surgical patients: protocol for a systematic review and component network meta-analysis."],"pmcid":["PMC9677017"],"funding_grant_id":["179837"],"pubmed_authors":["Grudzinski AL","McKeen D","Muscedere J","Fiore JF","Bryson G","Wallace T","Beaule P","Gill M","Fergusson D","Brindle M","Poitras S","Akhtar S","Martel G","Carli F","Gillam M","Branje K","Shaw J","Holroyd-Leduc J","Gillis C","Hladkowicz E","Prehabilitation Knowledge Network Authorship Group","Eskander A","Shorr R","Jackson T","Taljaard M","Moore R","Meliambro A","Basualdo-Hammond C","McCartney C","Wijeysundera D","Khadaroo R","Lalu M","Veroniki A","Atkins M","Boland L","Nantel J","Forster A","Love C","Gramlich L","McIsaac DI","Hutton B","Auer R","Aucoin S","Scheede-Bergdahl C","Moloo H"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Identifying relative efficacy of components of prehabilitation in adult surgical patients: protocol for a systematic review and component network meta-analysis.","description":"<h4>Introduction</h4>Prehabilitation is a high-priority intervention for patients, the public, clinicians and health systems. However, existing knowledge syntheses are generally low quality and do not provide insights regarding the relative efficacy of different prehabilitation components (eg, exercise, nutrition, psychosocial or cognitive interventions). The objective of the planned review is to evaluate the relative efficacy of different prehabilitation components to inform current care, implementation and future research.<h4>Methods and analysis</h4>We will perform a systematic review and component network meta-analysis (CNMA). We will use a peer-reviewed search strategy to identify all randomised trials of prehabilitation in adult surgical patients from Ovid Medline, Embase, the CINAHL","dates":{"release":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2022 Nov","modification":"2025-04-05T15:21:34.814Z","creation":"2025-04-05T15:21:34.814Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC9677017","cross_references":{"pubmed":["36396310"],"doi":["10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068797"]}}