<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Chen Y</submitter><funding>Howard Hughes Medical Institute</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><funding>NIH HHS</funding><pagination>e75064</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9681212</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>11</volume><pubmed_abstract>Transcription factors (TFs) are classically attributed a modular construction, containing well-structured sequence-specific DNA-binding domains (DBDs) paired with disordered activation domains (ADs) responsible for protein-protein interactions targeting co-factors or the core transcription initiation machinery. However, this simple division of labor model struggles to explain why TFs with identical DNA-binding sequence specificity determined in vitro exhibit distinct binding profiles in vivo. The family of hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) offer a stark example: aberrantly expressed in several cancer types, HIF-1α and HIF-2α subunit isoforms recognize the same DNA motif in vitro - the hypoxia response element (HRE) - but only share a subset of their target genes in vivo, while eliciting con</pubmed_abstract><journal>eLife</journal><pubmed_title>Mechanisms governing target search and binding dynamics of hypoxia-inducible factors.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9681212</pmcid><funding_grant_id>S10 OD018174</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U54 CA231641</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U54-CA231641-01</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Tjian R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Darzacq X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cattoglio C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dailey GM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhu Q</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Mechanisms governing target search and binding dynamics of hypoxia-inducible factors.</name><description>Transcription factors (TFs) are classically attributed a modular construction, containing well-structured sequence-specific DNA-binding domains (DBDs) paired with disordered activation domains (ADs) responsible for protein-protein interactions targeting co-factors or the core transcription initiation machinery. However, this simple division of labor model struggles to explain why TFs with identical DNA-binding sequence specificity determined in vitro exhibit distinct binding profiles in vivo. The family of hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) offer a stark example: aberrantly expressed in several cancer types, HIF-1α and HIF-2α subunit isoforms recognize the same DNA motif in vitro - the hypoxia response element (HRE) - but only share a subset of their target genes in vivo, while eliciting con</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Nov</publication><modification>2026-05-10T06:35:14.048Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T04:20:09.367Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9681212</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36322456</pubmed><doi>10.7554/eLife.75064</doi></cross_references></HashMap>