<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>111(12)</volume><submitter>Veulemans V</submitter><funding>Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf. Anstalt öffentlichen Rechts</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis has become more frequent in the last years. This may pose challenges for long-time valve durability. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (BVD) with the newest-generation devices in BAV stenosis up to one-year follow-up (FU).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>The primary endpoint was defined as the prevalence of BVD during the first procedural year according to Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 criteria. Secondary endpoints were defined as failure in device success and clinical endpoints according to VARC-3.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 107 patients were included. Of these, 34 subjects (31.8%) met the criteria for BVD during a mean FU of 263 ± 180 days,</pubmed_abstract><journal>Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society</journal><pagination>1358-1366</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9681687</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Bioprosthetic valve dysfunction and failure after TAVI in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis during one-year follow-up according to VARC-3.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9681687</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Kelm M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Binneboßel S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Heermann J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zeus T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Backer O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nuyens P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maier O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Veulemans V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jung C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Goh S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Westenfeld R</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Bioprosthetic valve dysfunction and failure after TAVI in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis during one-year follow-up according to VARC-3.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis has become more frequent in the last years. This may pose challenges for long-time valve durability. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (BVD) with the newest-generation devices in BAV stenosis up to one-year follow-up (FU).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>The primary endpoint was defined as the prevalence of BVD during the first procedural year according to Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 criteria. Secondary endpoints were defined as failure in device success and clinical endpoints according to VARC-3.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 107 patients were included. Of these, 34 subjects (31.8%) met the criteria for BVD during a mean FU of 263 ± 180 days,</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Dec</publication><modification>2025-04-04T22:35:37.122Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T22:35:37.122Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9681687</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35767098</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s00392-022-02052-9</doi></cross_references></HashMap>