<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>12</volume><submitter>Long J</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) versus laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) in the treatment of bladder cancer.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Two researchers independently searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and CBM using the index words to identify the qualified studies which included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled trials (prospective and retrospective studies), and the investigators scanned references of these articles to prevent missing articles. Differences in clinical outcomes between the two procedures were analyzed by calculating odds risk (OR) and mean difference (MD) with an associated 95% confidence interval (CI).&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Sixteen comparative studies were included in th</pubmed_abstract><journal>Frontiers in oncology</journal><pagination>1024739</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9681903</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic radical cystectomy in bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9681903</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Liang H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Long J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sun S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lin Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dong N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bai X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang L</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic radical cystectomy in bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) versus laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) in the treatment of bladder cancer.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Two researchers independently searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and CBM using the index words to identify the qualified studies which included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled trials (prospective and retrospective studies), and the investigators scanned references of these articles to prevent missing articles. Differences in clinical outcomes between the two procedures were analyzed by calculating odds risk (OR) and mean difference (MD) with an associated 95% confidence interval (CI).&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Sixteen comparative studies were included in th</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022</publication><modification>2025-04-21T19:04:27.49Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T17:28:38.345Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9681903</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36439450</pubmed><doi>10.3389/fonc.2022.1024739</doi></cross_references></HashMap>