<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>12</volume><submitter>Stevens GA</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Previous studies have observed that haemoglobin concentrations can be affected by type of blood collection, analysis methods and device, and that near-in-time population-based surveys report substantially different anaemia prevalence. We investigated whether differences in mean haemoglobin or prevalence of anaemia between near-in-time surveys of the same population were associated with differences in type of blood collection or analytic approach to haemoglobin measurement.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We systematically identified pairs of population-based surveys that measured haemoglobin in the same population of women of reproductive age (WRA) or preschool-aged children (PSC). Surveys were matched on geographic coverage, urban/rural place of residence, inclusion of pregnant women, t</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of global health</journal><pagination>04088</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9682214</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Associations between type of blood collection, analytical approach, mean haemoglobin and anaemia prevalence in population-based surveys: A systematic review and meta-analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9682214</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Rogers LM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Namaste S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stevens GA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Flores-Urrutia MC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Paciorek CJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wirth JP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rohner F</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Associations between type of blood collection, analytical approach, mean haemoglobin and anaemia prevalence in population-based surveys: A systematic review and meta-analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Previous studies have observed that haemoglobin concentrations can be affected by type of blood collection, analysis methods and device, and that near-in-time population-based surveys report substantially different anaemia prevalence. We investigated whether differences in mean haemoglobin or prevalence of anaemia between near-in-time surveys of the same population were associated with differences in type of blood collection or analytic approach to haemoglobin measurement.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We systematically identified pairs of population-based surveys that measured haemoglobin in the same population of women of reproductive age (WRA) or preschool-aged children (PSC). Surveys were matched on geographic coverage, urban/rural place of residence, inclusion of pregnant women, t</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Nov</publication><modification>2025-06-01T01:20:28.031Z</modification><creation>2025-06-01T01:20:28.031Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9682214</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36412108</pubmed><doi>10.7189/jogh.12.04088</doi></cross_references></HashMap>