<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>43(6)</volume><submitter>Khapuinamai A</submitter><funding>Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>Mucormycosis is a severe fungal infection caused by species of the order Mucorales. Early and accurate diagnosis is a prerequisite in the management of the disease. In the present study, we evaluated and compared two PCR-based techniques for the diagnosis and identification of mucormycosis in patients with rhino-orbital mucormycosis (ROM) post-COVID-19.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Diagnosed clinically and radiologically, 25 patients of ROM were included in the study and endoscopically or blind collected nasal swabs or orbital tissues were submitted for microbiological evaluation (direct microscopy + culture) and PCR using primers targeting two different loci (ITS and 28S rDNA region) for diagnosis. All PCR products were further processed for species identification using Sanger sequencing whenever possible.&lt;h4>Result&lt;/h4>Of the 25 samples included in the study, 16 samples were positive for presence of fungal filaments by Smear suggestive of Mucorales sp., but only 7/25 grew in culture. ITS-based PCR was able to identify mucormycosis in 7/25 (28%) samples and 28S rDNA PCR showed positivity for 19/25 (76%) samples. Rhizopus oryzae was found to be the predominant species in our study. The sensitivity and specificity of 28S rDNA PCR compared to culture were found to be 85.71% and 27.78%, respectively, while for ITS-based PCR, they were 42.86% and 77.78%, respectively.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>28S rDNA-based PCR is a reliable and sensitive method for early diagnosis of mucormycosis. Molecular techniques have shown a promising future to provide quick and effective treatment by accurately identifying the aetiologic agent.</pubmed_abstract><journal>International ophthalmology</journal><pagination>1803-1810</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9684940</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Molecular diagnosis of rhino-orbital mucormycosis in a COVID-19 setting.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9684940</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Joseph J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sharma S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Khapuinamai A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kapoor AG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dave TV</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Molecular diagnosis of rhino-orbital mucormycosis in a COVID-19 setting.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>Mucormycosis is a severe fungal infection caused by species of the order Mucorales. Early and accurate diagnosis is a prerequisite in the management of the disease. In the present study, we evaluated and compared two PCR-based techniques for the diagnosis and identification of mucormycosis in patients with rhino-orbital mucormycosis (ROM) post-COVID-19.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Diagnosed clinically and radiologically, 25 patients of ROM were included in the study and endoscopically or blind collected nasal swabs or orbital tissues were submitted for microbiological evaluation (direct microscopy + culture) and PCR using primers targeting two different loci (ITS and 28S rDNA region) for diagnosis. All PCR products were further processed for species identification using Sanger sequencing whenever possible.&lt;h4>Result&lt;/h4>Of the 25 samples included in the study, 16 samples were positive for presence of fungal filaments by Smear suggestive of Mucorales sp., but only 7/25 grew in culture. ITS-based PCR was able to identify mucormycosis in 7/25 (28%) samples and 28S rDNA PCR showed positivity for 19/25 (76%) samples. Rhizopus oryzae was found to be the predominant species in our study. The sensitivity and specificity of 28S rDNA PCR compared to culture were found to be 85.71% and 27.78%, respectively, while for ITS-based PCR, they were 42.86% and 77.78%, respectively.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>28S rDNA-based PCR is a reliable and sensitive method for early diagnosis of mucormycosis. Molecular techniques have shown a promising future to provide quick and effective treatment by accurately identifying the aetiologic agent.</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Jun</publication><modification>2025-04-19T22:47:16.177Z</modification><creation>2025-04-19T22:47:16.177Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9684940</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36414852</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s10792-022-02577-y</doi></cross_references></HashMap>