<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Rauwerdink DJW</submitter><funding>ZonMw</funding><pagination>5694</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9688066</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>14(22)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Nodular melanoma (NM) is associated with a higher locoregional and distant recurrence rate compared with superficial spreading melanoma (SSM); it is unknown whether the efficacy of systemic therapy is limited. Here, we compare the efficacy of immunotherapy and BRAF/MEK inhibitors (BRAF/MEKi) in advanced NM to SSM. Patients with advanced stage IIIc and stage IV NM and SSM treated with anti-CTLA-4 and/or anti-PD-1, or BRAF/MEKi in the first line, were included from the prospective Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry. The primary objectives were distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS). In total, 1086 NM and 2246 SSM patients were included. DMFS was significantly shorter for advanced NM patients at 1.9 years (CI 95% 0.7−4.2) compared with SSM patients at 3.1 years (CI 95% 1.3−6.2) (p &lt; 0.01). Multivariate survival analysis for immunotherapy and BRAF/MEKi demonstrated a hazard ratio for immunotherapy of 1.0 (CI 95% 0.85−1.17) and BRAF/MEKi of 0.95 (CI 95% 0.81−1.11). A shorter DMFS for NM patients developing advanced disease compared with SSM patients was observed, while no difference was observed in the efficacy of systemic immunotherapy or BRAF/MEKi between NM and SSM patients. Our results suggests that the worse overall survival of NM is mainly driven by propensity of metastatic outgrowth of NM after primary diagnosis.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Cancers</journal><pubmed_title>Systemic Therapy in Advanced Nodular Melanoma versus Superficial Spreading Melanoma: A Nation-Wide Study of the Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9688066</pmcid><funding_grant_id>836002002</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>van der Hage J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Van Rijn RS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Van der Veldt A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wouters MWJM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aarts M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Piersma D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Berkmortel F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Haanen JBAG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van der Kooij M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Blank CU</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Meza M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Boers-Sonderen MJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Van den Eertwegh AJM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hospers GAP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>De Groot JWB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kapiteijn E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Suijkerbuijk K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Doorn R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rauwerdink DJW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vreugdenhil G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stevense M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Systemic Therapy in Advanced Nodular Melanoma versus Superficial Spreading Melanoma: A Nation-Wide Study of the Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry.</name><description>Nodular melanoma (NM) is associated with a higher locoregional and distant recurrence rate compared with superficial spreading melanoma (SSM); it is unknown whether the efficacy of systemic therapy is limited. Here, we compare the efficacy of immunotherapy and BRAF/MEK inhibitors (BRAF/MEKi) in advanced NM to SSM. Patients with advanced stage IIIc and stage IV NM and SSM treated with anti-CTLA-4 and/or anti-PD-1, or BRAF/MEKi in the first line, were included from the prospective Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry. The primary objectives were distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS). In total, 1086 NM and 2246 SSM patients were included. DMFS was significantly shorter for advanced NM patients at 1.9 years (CI 95% 0.7−4.2) compared with SSM patients at 3.1 years (CI 95% 1.3−6.2) (p &lt; 0.01). Multivariate survival analysis for immunotherapy and BRAF/MEKi demonstrated a hazard ratio for immunotherapy of 1.0 (CI 95% 0.85−1.17) and BRAF/MEKi of 0.95 (CI 95% 0.81−1.11). A shorter DMFS for NM patients developing advanced disease compared with SSM patients was observed, while no difference was observed in the efficacy of systemic immunotherapy or BRAF/MEKi between NM and SSM patients. Our results suggests that the worse overall survival of NM is mainly driven by propensity of metastatic outgrowth of NM after primary diagnosis.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Nov</publication><modification>2025-04-04T13:46:53.42Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T13:46:53.42Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9688066</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36428787</pubmed><doi>10.3390/cancers14225694</doi></cross_references></HashMap>