<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>12(11)</volume><submitter>Falsetti P</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>There is little consensus on ultrasound (US) normative values of cross-sectional area of median nerve (MN-CSA) in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) because of its dependency on anthropometric parameters. We aim to propose a novel anthropometric-independent US parameter: MN-CSA/flexor radialis carpi CSA (FCR-CSA) ratio ("Nerve Tendon Ratio", NTR), in the diagnosis of clinically and electrodiagnostic (EDS)-defined CTS.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>74 wrists of 49 patients with clinically defined CTS underwent EDS (scored by the 1-5 Padua Scale of electrophysiological severity, PS) and US of carpal tunnel with measurement of MN-CSA (at the carpal tunnel inlet), FCR-CSA (over scaphoid tubercle) and its ratio (NTR, expressed as a percentage). US normality values and intra-operator agreement were assessed in 33 healthy volunteers.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>In controls, the mean MN-CSA was 5.81 mm&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>, NTR 64.2%. In 74 clinical CTS, the mean MN-CSA was 12.1 mm&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>, NTR 117%. In severe CTS (PS &amp;gt; 3), the mean MN-CSA was 15.9 mm&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>, NTR 148%. In CTS, both MN-CSA and NTR correlated with sensitive conduction velocity (SCV) (&lt;i>p&lt;/i> &amp;lt; 0.001), distal motor latency (DML) (&lt;i>p&lt;/i> &amp;lt; 0.001) and PS (&lt;i>p&lt;/i> &amp;lt; 0.001), with a slight superiority of NTR vs. MN-CSA when controlled for height, wrist circumference and weight. In CTS filtered for anthropometric extremes, only NTR maintained a correlation with SCV (&lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.023), DML (&lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.016) and PS (&lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.009). Diagnostic cut-offs were obtained with a binomial regression analysis. In those patients with a clinical diagnosis of CTS, the cut-off of MN-CSA (AUROC: 0.983) was 8 mm&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> (9 mm&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> with highest positive predictive value, PPV), while for NTR (AUROC: 0.987), the cut-off was 83% (100% with highest PPV). In patients with EDS findings of severe CTS (PS &amp;gt; 3), the MN-CSA (AUROC: 0.876) cut-off was 12.3 mm&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> (15.3 mm&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> with highest PPV), while for NTR (AUROC: 0.858) it was 116.2% (146.0% with highest PPV).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>NTR can be simply and quickly calculated, and it can be used in anthropometric extremes.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)</journal><pagination>2621</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9689936</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>A Novel Ultrasonographic Anthropometric-Independent Measurement of Median Nerve Swelling in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: The "Nerve/Tendon Ratio" (NTR).</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9689936</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Conticini E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gentileschi S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cantarini L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Acciai C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Frediani B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ginanneschi F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bardelli M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>D'Alessandro R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Falsetti P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>D'Alessandro M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Baldi C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>D'Ignazio E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Al Khayyat SG</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>A Novel Ultrasonographic Anthropometric-Independent Measurement of Median Nerve Swelling in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: The "Nerve/Tendon Ratio" (NTR).</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>There is little consensus on ultrasound (US) normative values of cross-sectional area of median nerve (MN-CSA) in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) because of its dependency on anthropometric parameters. We aim to propose a novel anthropometric-independent US parameter: MN-CSA/flexor radialis carpi CSA (FCR-CSA) ratio ("Nerve Tendon Ratio", NTR), in the diagnosis of clinically and electrodiagnostic (EDS)-defined CTS.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>74 wrists of 49 patients with clinically defined CTS underwent EDS (scored by the 1-5 Padua Scale of electrophysiological severity, PS) and US of carpal tunnel with measurement of MN-CSA (at the carpal tunnel inlet), FCR-CSA (over scaphoid tubercle) and its ratio (NTR, expressed as a percentage). US normality values and intra-operator agreement were assessed in 33 healthy volunteers.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>In controls, the mean MN-CSA was 5.81 mm&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>, NTR 64.2%. In 74 clinical CTS, the mean MN-CSA was 12.1 mm&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>, NTR 117%. In severe CTS (PS &amp;gt; 3), the mean MN-CSA was 15.9 mm&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>, NTR 148%. In CTS, both MN-CSA and NTR correlated with sensitive conduction velocity (SCV) (&lt;i>p&lt;/i> &amp;lt; 0.001), distal motor latency (DML) (&lt;i>p&lt;/i> &amp;lt; 0.001) and PS (&lt;i>p&lt;/i> &amp;lt; 0.001), with a slight superiority of NTR vs. MN-CSA when controlled for height, wrist circumference and weight. In CTS filtered for anthropometric extremes, only NTR maintained a correlation with SCV (&lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.023), DML (&lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.016) and PS (&lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.009). Diagnostic cut-offs were obtained with a binomial regression analysis. In those patients with a clinical diagnosis of CTS, the cut-off of MN-CSA (AUROC: 0.983) was 8 mm&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> (9 mm&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> with highest positive predictive value, PPV), while for NTR (AUROC: 0.987), the cut-off was 83% (100% with highest PPV). In patients with EDS findings of severe CTS (PS &amp;gt; 3), the MN-CSA (AUROC: 0.876) cut-off was 12.3 mm&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> (15.3 mm&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> with highest PPV), while for NTR (AUROC: 0.858) it was 116.2% (146.0% with highest PPV).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>NTR can be simply and quickly calculated, and it can be used in anthropometric extremes.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Oct</publication><modification>2025-04-19T16:10:24.735Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T01:56:43.27Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9689936</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36359465</pubmed><doi>10.3390/diagnostics12112621</doi></cross_references></HashMap>