<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>10</volume><submitter>Wu Y</submitter><funding>Wenzhou City Key Innovation Team of Reproductive Genetics Grant, Zhejiang, China</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>  To investigate transfer strategies in the frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycle. &lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4> The clinical data of 1,652 FET patients were divided into five groups according to the number and quality of the transferred blastocyst: high-quality single blastocyst group (group A, n = 558), high-quality plus poor-quality double blastocyst group (group B, n = 435), poor-quality double blastocyst group (group C, n = 241), high-quality double blastocyst group (group D, n = 298), and poor-quality single blastocyst group (group E, n = 120). Inter-group comparison analyses of primary conditions, pregnancy outcomes and neonatal outcomes were then performed. &lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4> Group A had the highest embryo implantation rate (67.38%), significantly different from the implanta</pubmed_abstract><journal>PeerJ</journal><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9703987</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Comparison of frozen-thawed embryo transfer strategies for the treatment of infertility in young women: a retrospective study</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9703987</pmcid><funding_grant_id>C20170007</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Ma L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lu X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fu Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhao J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wu Y</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Comparison of frozen-thawed embryo transfer strategies for the treatment of infertility in young women: a retrospective study</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>  To investigate transfer strategies in the frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycle. &lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4> The clinical data of 1,652 FET patients were divided into five groups according to the number and quality of the transferred blastocyst: high-quality single blastocyst group (group A, n = 558), high-quality plus poor-quality double blastocyst group (group B, n = 435), poor-quality double blastocyst group (group C, n = 241), high-quality double blastocyst group (group D, n = 298), and poor-quality single blastocyst group (group E, n = 120). Inter-group comparison analyses of primary conditions, pregnancy outcomes and neonatal outcomes were then performed. &lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4> Group A had the highest embryo implantation rate (67.38%), significantly different from the implanta</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Jan</publication><modification>2025-04-18T13:20:14.434Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T22:57:41.621Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9703987</accession><cross_references/></HashMap>