<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>21</volume><submitter>Vuong V</submitter><funding>Jacka Foundation of Natural Therapies</funding><funding>Western Sydney University</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Weight gain after breast cancer is common, and obesity after breast cancer increases breast cancer recurrence and mortality. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) and yoga have been shown to be effective in managing obesity/overweight in people without breast cancer. There is a need to systematically map the extent and range of evidence on yoga and MBIs for managing obesity/overweight after breast cancer in order to aid planning and commissioning of future research.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We conducted a scoping review informed by methods described by Levac et al. Five electronic databases were searched for any peer-reviewed original research (including systematic reviews) that examined the role of yoga and/or MBIs for managing overweight/obesity after breast cancer. Data were extracted on study, population, intervention, comparator and outcome characteristics, and described narratively.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>We found 18 publications representing 15 unique studies (11 clinical trials, 2 systematic reviews, and 2 observational studies). There were 10 studies on yoga, and 5 on MBIs. Of the clinical trials, only 4/11 examined a weight-related outcome as the primary outcome. The remaining trials examined lifestyle or metabolic outcomes (5/11) or unrelated outcomes such as psychological health (2/11). Gaps in the literature included small sample sizes, lack of cultural diversity amongst participants, inadequate reporting of the intervention, few lifestyle co-interventions offered, lack of active comparator groups, and inadequate safety reporting.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>There is a need for adequately-powered RCTs that adhere to reporting guidelines. The use of gold-standard methods for measuring outcomes, and active comparator groups, is also recommended.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Integrative cancer therapies</journal><pagination>15347354221137321</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9706063</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Mindfulness-based Interventions and Yoga for Managing Obesity/Overweight After Breast Cancer: A Scoping Review.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9706063</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Vuong V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ee C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rao V</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Mindfulness-based Interventions and Yoga for Managing Obesity/Overweight After Breast Cancer: A Scoping Review.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Weight gain after breast cancer is common, and obesity after breast cancer increases breast cancer recurrence and mortality. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) and yoga have been shown to be effective in managing obesity/overweight in people without breast cancer. There is a need to systematically map the extent and range of evidence on yoga and MBIs for managing obesity/overweight after breast cancer in order to aid planning and commissioning of future research.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We conducted a scoping review informed by methods described by Levac et al. Five electronic databases were searched for any peer-reviewed original research (including systematic reviews) that examined the role of yoga and/or MBIs for managing overweight/obesity after breast cancer. Data were extracted on study, population, intervention, comparator and outcome characteristics, and described narratively.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>We found 18 publications representing 15 unique studies (11 clinical trials, 2 systematic reviews, and 2 observational studies). There were 10 studies on yoga, and 5 on MBIs. Of the clinical trials, only 4/11 examined a weight-related outcome as the primary outcome. The remaining trials examined lifestyle or metabolic outcomes (5/11) or unrelated outcomes such as psychological health (2/11). Gaps in the literature included small sample sizes, lack of cultural diversity amongst participants, inadequate reporting of the intervention, few lifestyle co-interventions offered, lack of active comparator groups, and inadequate safety reporting.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>There is a need for adequately-powered RCTs that adhere to reporting guidelines. The use of gold-standard methods for measuring outcomes, and active comparator groups, is also recommended.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Jan-Dec</publication><modification>2026-06-03T10:36:07.579Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T08:33:48.741Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9706063</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36412918</pubmed><doi>10.1177/15347354221137321</doi></cross_references></HashMap>