<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>5(11)</volume><submitter>Puechal X</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Importance&lt;/h4>Results of randomized clinical trials have demonstrated rituximab's noninferiority to cyclophosphamide as induction therapy for antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides (AAV), with neither treatment having a specific advantage for granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA). However, post hoc analysis results have suggested that rituximab might be more effective than cyclophosphamide in inducing remission in patients with proteinase 3-positive AAV.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To compare the effectiveness of rituximab and cyclophosphamide in inducing GPA remission in a large population of unselected patients.&lt;h4>Design, setting, and participants&lt;/h4>This comparative effectiveness study used multicenter target trial emulation observational data from 32 French hospi</pubmed_abstract><journal>JAMA network open</journal><pagination>e2243799</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9706346</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Rituximab vs Cyclophosphamide Induction Therapy for Patients With Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9706346</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Neel A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rossert J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vinzio S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Merrien D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Puechal X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bezanahary H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Porcher R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thervet E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Quemeneur T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mouthon L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Regent A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ayach B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Graffin B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jebrak G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bonnotte B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gondran G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Perrodeau E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Desmurs-Clavel H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Le Jeunne C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Michel M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Le Gallou T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Achard-Hottelart C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Colin T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Karras A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Olivier Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Limal N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marie I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dion JJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pasqualoni E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Blanchard-Delaunay C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Delbrel X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Legallicier B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Terrier B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Imbert B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hamidou M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ruivard M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lifermann F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cohen P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Grassin F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guillevin L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Diot E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>French Vasculitis Study Group</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Iudici M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cottin V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Loustaud-Ratti V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Lacroix-Szmania I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hanrotel-Saliou C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Charasse C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Boffa JJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Godeau B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aumaitre O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aouba A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ravaud P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Le Hello C</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Rituximab vs Cyclophosphamide Induction Therapy for Patients With Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Importance&lt;/h4>Results of randomized clinical trials have demonstrated rituximab's noninferiority to cyclophosphamide as induction therapy for antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides (AAV), with neither treatment having a specific advantage for granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA). However, post hoc analysis results have suggested that rituximab might be more effective than cyclophosphamide in inducing remission in patients with proteinase 3-positive AAV.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To compare the effectiveness of rituximab and cyclophosphamide in inducing GPA remission in a large population of unselected patients.&lt;h4>Design, setting, and participants&lt;/h4>This comparative effectiveness study used multicenter target trial emulation observational data from 32 French hospi</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Nov</publication><modification>2025-04-29T11:09:56.007Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T19:49:38.3Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9706346</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36441554</pubmed><doi>10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.43799</doi></cross_references></HashMap>