<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Marziali ME</submitter><funding>NIDA NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse</funding><pagination>1085-1093</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9706817</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>43(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;i>Objective:&lt;/i> While peer influence is a well-documented risk factor for adolescent substance use, it remains unclear whether peer or parental attitudes have greater impact, and if this relationship is moderated by having a confidant and the relationship between adolescents and their confidant. &lt;i>Method&lt;/i>: Pooled (2015-2018) National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) data on adolescents (12-17 years) were used. Perceived peer and parental disapproval of tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana use were dichotomized. We assessed associations between disapproval and past-month tobacco (&lt;i>N&lt;/i> = 51,352), alcohol (&lt;i>N&lt;/i> = 51,407), and marijuana use (&lt;i>N&lt;/i> = 51,355) using separate multivariable logistic regression models. We explored effect modification by the presence of a confidant, parental vs. non-parental disapproval, and peer vs. non-peer confidant relationship. &lt;i>Results&lt;/i>: Peer and parental disapproval, presence of any confidant, and identifying a parental confidant were consistently protective against substance use; identifying a peer confidant increased odds of use across substances. For marijuana use, peer disapproval (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.06, 0.08) was more protective than parental disapproval (aOR: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.15). The joint presence of peer/parental disapproval and any confidant decreased the odds of substance use beyond the individual effects of peer/parental disapproval and having a confidant. However, having a peer confidant attenuated the protective association between peer/parental disapproval and tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana use. &lt;i>Conclusions&lt;/i>: Both peer and parental relationships are salient when considering the social context of adolescent substance use and should be considered when studying the effects of perceived disapproval.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Substance abuse</journal><pubmed_title>Perceptions of peer and parental attitudes toward substance use and actual adolescent substance use: The impact of adolescent-confidant relationships.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9706817</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R01DA037866</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 DA037866</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32DA031099</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32 DA031099</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Levy NS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Martins SS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marziali ME</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Perceptions of peer and parental attitudes toward substance use and actual adolescent substance use: The impact of adolescent-confidant relationships.</name><description>&lt;i>Objective:&lt;/i> While peer influence is a well-documented risk factor for adolescent substance use, it remains unclear whether peer or parental attitudes have greater impact, and if this relationship is moderated by having a confidant and the relationship between adolescents and their confidant. &lt;i>Method&lt;/i>: Pooled (2015-2018) National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) data on adolescents (12-17 years) were used. Perceived peer and parental disapproval of tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana use were dichotomized. We assessed associations between disapproval and past-month tobacco (&lt;i>N&lt;/i> = 51,352), alcohol (&lt;i>N&lt;/i> = 51,407), and marijuana use (&lt;i>N&lt;/i> = 51,355) using separate multivariable logistic regression models. We explored effect modification by the presence of a confidant, parental vs. non-parental disapproval, and peer vs. non-peer confidant relationship. &lt;i>Results&lt;/i>: Peer and parental disapproval, presence of any confidant, and identifying a parental confidant were consistently protective against substance use; identifying a peer confidant increased odds of use across substances. For marijuana use, peer disapproval (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.06, 0.08) was more protective than parental disapproval (aOR: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.15). The joint presence of peer/parental disapproval and any confidant decreased the odds of substance use beyond the individual effects of peer/parental disapproval and having a confidant. However, having a peer confidant attenuated the protective association between peer/parental disapproval and tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana use. &lt;i>Conclusions&lt;/i>: Both peer and parental relationships are salient when considering the social context of adolescent substance use and should be considered when studying the effects of perceived disapproval.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022</publication><modification>2025-04-19T18:07:43.497Z</modification><creation>2025-04-19T18:07:43.497Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9706817</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35442871</pubmed><doi>10.1080/08897077.2022.2060439</doi></cross_references></HashMap>