<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Zhao SS</submitter><funding>Versus Arthritis</funding><funding>British Society for Rheumatology</funding><funding>BSR Biologics Register in Rheumatoid Arthritis</funding><funding>National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)</funding><funding>NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre</funding><pagination>4678-4686</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9707051</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>61(12)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>Whether patients with RA benefit from repeated trials of biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) after three or more attempts is unknown. We aimed to describe treatment outcomes in each line of b/tsDMARD therapy.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Using data from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for RA from 2001 to 2020, change to a new b/tsDMARD (except biosimilar switches) was defined as a new line of therapy. Treatment outcomes were compared across lines of therapy, including DAS28 remission (≤2.6), low disease activity (LDA, ≤3.2) at 6 months and median time to drug discontinuation. Multiple imputation was used for missing data.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 22 934 individuals starting a first b/tsDMARD were included (mean age 56 years, 76% female), among w</pubmed_abstract><journal>Rheumatology (Oxford, England)</journal><pubmed_title>Effectiveness of sequential biologic and targeted disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9707051</pmcid><funding_grant_id>21755</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>BSRBR-RA Contributors Group</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhao SS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bosworth A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hyrich KL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kearsley-Fleet L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Watson K</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Effectiveness of sequential biologic and targeted disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>Whether patients with RA benefit from repeated trials of biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) after three or more attempts is unknown. We aimed to describe treatment outcomes in each line of b/tsDMARD therapy.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Using data from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for RA from 2001 to 2020, change to a new b/tsDMARD (except biosimilar switches) was defined as a new line of therapy. Treatment outcomes were compared across lines of therapy, including DAS28 remission (≤2.6), low disease activity (LDA, ≤3.2) at 6 months and median time to drug discontinuation. Multiple imputation was used for missing data.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 22 934 individuals starting a first b/tsDMARD were included (mean age 56 years, 76% female), among w</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Nov</publication><modification>2025-04-05T09:43:10.089Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T09:43:10.089Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9707051</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35357421</pubmed><doi>10.1093/rheumatology/keac190</doi></cross_references></HashMap>