<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Parker R</submitter><funding>World Health Organization</funding><funding>Cochrane</funding><funding>Canadian Institutes of Health Research</funding><funding>CIHR</funding><pagination>4047-4053</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9708980</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>37(16)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Health research teams increasingly partner with stakeholders to produce research that is relevant, accessible, and widely used. Previous work has covered stakeholder group identification.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>We aimed to develop factors for health research teams to consider during identification and invitation of individual representatives in a multi-stakeholder research partnership, with the aim of forming equitable and informed teams.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Consensus development.&lt;h4>Participants&lt;/h4&gt;We involved 16 stakeholders from the international Multi-Stakeholder Engagement (MuSE) Consortium, including patients and the public, providers, payers of health services/purchasers, policy makers, programme managers, peer review editors, and principal investigators.&lt;h4>Approach&lt;/h4>We </pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of general internal medicine</journal><pubmed_title>Factors to Consider During Identification and Invitation of Individuals in a Multi-stakeholder Research Partnership.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9708980</pmcid><funding_grant_id>001</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>PJT-155970</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Akl E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Welch VA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brahem AB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dormer L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Petkovic J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tomlinson E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Teixeira L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lang E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marusic A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Avey M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ekanem C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Palm M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Arayssi T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Concannon TW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Slingers N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tugwell P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Akl IB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moja L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Greer-Smith R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Crowe S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Saginur M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kuchenmuller T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Parker R</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Factors to Consider During Identification and Invitation of Individuals in a Multi-stakeholder Research Partnership.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Health research teams increasingly partner with stakeholders to produce research that is relevant, accessible, and widely used. Previous work has covered stakeholder group identification.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>We aimed to develop factors for health research teams to consider during identification and invitation of individual representatives in a multi-stakeholder research partnership, with the aim of forming equitable and informed teams.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Consensus development.&lt;h4>Participants&lt;/h4&gt;We involved 16 stakeholders from the international Multi-Stakeholder Engagement (MuSE) Consortium, including patients and the public, providers, payers of health services/purchasers, policy makers, programme managers, peer review editors, and principal investigators.&lt;h4>Approach&lt;/h4>We </description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Dec</publication><modification>2025-04-19T18:55:54.553Z</modification><creation>2025-04-19T18:55:54.553Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9708980</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35132560</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s11606-022-07411-w</doi></cross_references></HashMap>