<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>38(7)</volume><submitter>Chan EY</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Remote patient monitoring (RPM) for automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) may improve clinical outcomes. Paediatric data, however, remain extremely scarce.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We conducted a prospective observational study of children (0-18 years) receiving APD with cloud-based RPM over two 24-week periods (pre- and post-RPM). Primary outcomes were unplanned hospitalizations and fluid management. Children receiving APD without RPM (non-RPM) were included as control.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Seven patients (6 females) receiving APD were enrolled in the RPM programme at 11.3 years (IQR 2.6-17.1). Main indications for RPM included history of fluid overload (n = 3) and non-adherence (n = 2). Ten children were included in the non-RPM group (6 females; 16.9 years, IQR 12.8-17.6). Four patients (57.1%, 95% CI 22.5-100%) experienced fewer unplanned hospitalizations and 5 patients (71.4%, 95% CI 34.1-100%) had shorter hospital stays during the post-RPM period. The hospitalization rates and length of stay were reduced by 45% and 42%, respectively. The higher hospitalization rates among the RPM group, compared to the non-RPM group, were no longer observed following implementation of RPM. There was a significant increase in ultrafiltration (565.6 ± 248.7 vs. 501.7 ± 286.6 ml/day, p = 0.03) and reduction in systolic blood pressure (114.1 ± 12.6 vs. 119.9 ± 11.19 mmHg, p = 0.02) during the post-RPM period. All patients demonstrated satisfactory adherence. Although quality of life (PedsQL 3.0 ESRD module) was not different pre- and post-RPM, all patients agreed in the questionnaires that the use of RPM improved their quality of life and sense of security.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>In conclusion, RPM in children receiving APD is associated with fewer and shorter unplanned hospitalizations, improved fluid management and favourable adherence to PD. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)</journal><pagination>2171-2178</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9709751</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Outcomes and perception of cloud-based remote patient monitoring in children receiving automated peritoneal dialysis: a prospective study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9709751</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Chan EY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu MS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Or PC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ma AL</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Outcomes and perception of cloud-based remote patient monitoring in children receiving automated peritoneal dialysis: a prospective study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Remote patient monitoring (RPM) for automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) may improve clinical outcomes. Paediatric data, however, remain extremely scarce.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We conducted a prospective observational study of children (0-18 years) receiving APD with cloud-based RPM over two 24-week periods (pre- and post-RPM). Primary outcomes were unplanned hospitalizations and fluid management. Children receiving APD without RPM (non-RPM) were included as control.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Seven patients (6 females) receiving APD were enrolled in the RPM programme at 11.3 years (IQR 2.6-17.1). Main indications for RPM included history of fluid overload (n = 3) and non-adherence (n = 2). Ten children were included in the non-RPM group (6 females; 16.9 years, IQR 12.8-17.6). Four patients (57.1%, 95% CI 22.5-100%) experienced fewer unplanned hospitalizations and 5 patients (71.4%, 95% CI 34.1-100%) had shorter hospital stays during the post-RPM period. The hospitalization rates and length of stay were reduced by 45% and 42%, respectively. The higher hospitalization rates among the RPM group, compared to the non-RPM group, were no longer observed following implementation of RPM. There was a significant increase in ultrafiltration (565.6 ± 248.7 vs. 501.7 ± 286.6 ml/day, p = 0.03) and reduction in systolic blood pressure (114.1 ± 12.6 vs. 119.9 ± 11.19 mmHg, p = 0.02) during the post-RPM period. All patients demonstrated satisfactory adherence. Although quality of life (PedsQL 3.0 ESRD module) was not different pre- and post-RPM, all patients agreed in the questionnaires that the use of RPM improved their quality of life and sense of security.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>In conclusion, RPM in children receiving APD is associated with fewer and shorter unplanned hospitalizations, improved fluid management and favourable adherence to PD. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Jul</publication><modification>2025-04-19T14:42:16.505Z</modification><creation>2025-04-19T14:42:16.505Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9709751</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36449100</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s00467-022-05828-3</doi></cross_references></HashMap>