{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["75(11)"],"submitter":["Buckel WR"],"pubmed_abstract":["Twenty of 21 health systems and network-based antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) who were invited participated in a questionnaire, a webinar, and focus groups to understand implementation strategies for system-wide antimicrobial stewardship. Four centralized ASPs structures emerged. Of participating organizations, 3 (15%) confirmed classification as collaborative, 3 (15%) as centrally coordinated, 3 (15%) as in between or in transition between centrally coordinated and centrally led, 8 (40%) as centrally led, 2 (10%) as collaborative, consultative network. One (5%) organization considered themselves to be a hybrid. System-level stewardship responsibilities varied across sites and generally fell into 6 major categories: building and leading a stewardship community, strategic planning and goal setting, development of validated data streams, leveraging tools and technology for stewardship interventions, provision of subject-matter expertise, and communication/education. Centralized ASPs included in this study most commonly took a centrally led approach and engaged in activities tailored to system-wide goals."],"journal":["Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America"],"pagination":["2038-2044"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9710658"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Harnessing the Power of Health Systems and Networks for Antimicrobial Stewardship."],"pmcid":["PMC9710658"],"pubmed_authors":["Hyun DY","Buckel WR","Hersh AL","Stenehjem EA","Zetts RM"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Harnessing the Power of Health Systems and Networks for Antimicrobial Stewardship.","description":"Twenty of 21 health systems and network-based antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) who were invited participated in a questionnaire, a webinar, and focus groups to understand implementation strategies for system-wide antimicrobial stewardship. Four centralized ASPs structures emerged. Of participating organizations, 3 (15%) confirmed classification as collaborative, 3 (15%) as centrally coordinated, 3 (15%) as in between or in transition between centrally coordinated and centrally led, 8 (40%) as centrally led, 2 (10%) as collaborative, consultative network. One (5%) organization considered themselves to be a hybrid. System-level stewardship responsibilities varied across sites and generally fell into 6 major categories: building and leading a stewardship community, strategic planning and goal setting, development of validated data streams, leveraging tools and technology for stewardship interventions, provision of subject-matter expertise, and communication/education. Centralized ASPs included in this study most commonly took a centrally led approach and engaged in activities tailored to system-wide goals.","dates":{"release":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2022 Nov","modification":"2026-04-08T03:26:48.71Z","creation":"2026-04-07T21:17:21.613Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC9710658","cross_references":{"pubmed":["35758333"],"doi":["10.1093/cid/ciac515"]}}