<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>58(4)</volume><submitter>Pedersen ML</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>To identify and summarise extant knowledge about patient ethnicity and the use of various types of restrictive practices in adult mental health inpatient settings.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A scoping review methodological framework recommended by the JBI was used. A systematic search was conducted in APA PsycINFO, CINAHL with Full Text, Embase, PubMed and Scopus. Additionally, grey literature searches were conducted in Google, OpenGrey and selected websites, and the reference lists of included studies were explored.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Altogether, 38 studies were included: 34 were primary studies; 4, reviews. The geographical settings were as follows: Europe (n = 26), Western Pacific (n = 8), Americas (n = 3) and South-East Asia (n = 1). In primary studies, ethnicity was reported according</pubmed_abstract><journal>Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology</journal><pagination>505-522</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9713127</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Ethnic disparities in the use of restrictive practices in adult mental health inpatient settings: a scoping review.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9713127</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Gildberg F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pedersen ML</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Baker J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tingleff EB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Damsgaard JB</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Ethnic disparities in the use of restrictive practices in adult mental health inpatient settings: a scoping review.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>To identify and summarise extant knowledge about patient ethnicity and the use of various types of restrictive practices in adult mental health inpatient settings.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A scoping review methodological framework recommended by the JBI was used. A systematic search was conducted in APA PsycINFO, CINAHL with Full Text, Embase, PubMed and Scopus. Additionally, grey literature searches were conducted in Google, OpenGrey and selected websites, and the reference lists of included studies were explored.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Altogether, 38 studies were included: 34 were primary studies; 4, reviews. The geographical settings were as follows: Europe (n = 26), Western Pacific (n = 8), Americas (n = 3) and South-East Asia (n = 1). In primary studies, ethnicity was reported according</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Apr</publication><modification>2025-04-04T13:46:38.583Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T13:46:38.583Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9713127</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36454269</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s00127-022-02387-8</doi></cross_references></HashMap>