<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Davies C</submitter><funding>NICHD NIH HHS</funding><funding>NCATS NIH HHS</funding><pagination>2703-2712</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9713912</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>18(12)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Study objectives&lt;/h4>Evaluate per-patient diagnostic performance of a wireless dual-sensor system (ANNE sleep) compared with reference standard polysomnography (PSG) for the diagnosis of moderate and severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with a minimum prespecified threshold of 80% for both sensitivity and specificity.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A multicenter clinical trial was conducted to evaluate ANNE sleep vs PSG to diagnose moderate and severe OSA in individuals 22 years or older. For each testing approach, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was manually scored and averaged by 3 registered sleep technologists blinded to the other system. Average variations > 15% were adjudicated by a sleep medicine physician.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>In a total of n = 225 participants (mean age 53 years, range 22-88 years), PSG</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine</journal><pubmed_title>A single-arm, open-label, multicenter, and comparative study of the ANNE sleep system vs polysomnography to diagnose obstructive sleep apnea.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9713912</pmcid><funding_grant_id>UL1 TR001422</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K12 HD050121</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Kim D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Power T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yu L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cziraky M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rangel SM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Miller J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zee P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gill K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kalluri L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cooksey J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Harty BJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stanek E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Park J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Edel C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ran DS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Walter J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Blake S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee JY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schauer J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lim A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Toloui O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xu S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Olagbenro MO</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Serao A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Davies C</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>A single-arm, open-label, multicenter, and comparative study of the ANNE sleep system vs polysomnography to diagnose obstructive sleep apnea.</name><description>&lt;h4>Study objectives&lt;/h4>Evaluate per-patient diagnostic performance of a wireless dual-sensor system (ANNE sleep) compared with reference standard polysomnography (PSG) for the diagnosis of moderate and severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with a minimum prespecified threshold of 80% for both sensitivity and specificity.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A multicenter clinical trial was conducted to evaluate ANNE sleep vs PSG to diagnose moderate and severe OSA in individuals 22 years or older. For each testing approach, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was manually scored and averaged by 3 registered sleep technologists blinded to the other system. Average variations > 15% were adjudicated by a sleep medicine physician.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>In a total of n = 225 participants (mean age 53 years, range 22-88 years), PSG</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Dec</publication><modification>2026-06-17T06:39:41.759Z</modification><creation>2025-05-29T21:47:19.885Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9713912</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35934926</pubmed><doi>10.5664/jcsm.10194</doi></cross_references></HashMap>