<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>20(11)</volume><submitter>Karp NA</submitter><pubmed_abstract>In animal experiments, blinding (also known as masking) is a methodological strategy to reduce the risk that scientists, animal care staff, or other staff involved in the research may consciously or subconsciously influence the outcome. Lack of masking has been shown to correlate with an overestimation of treatment efficacy and false positive findings. We conducted exploratory interviews across academic and a commercial setting to discuss the implementation of masking at four stages of the experiment: during allocation and intervention, during the conduct of the experiment, during the outcome assessment, and during the data analysis. The objective was to explore the awareness, engagement, perceptions, and the barriers to implementing masking in animal experiments. We conducted multiple int</pubmed_abstract><journal>PLoS biology</journal><pagination>e3001873</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9714947</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>A qualitative study of the barriers to using blinding in in vivo experiments and suggestions for improvement.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9714947</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Stringer EJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Barkus C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ulrichsen JC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Karp NA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Percie du Sert N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pearl EJ</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>A qualitative study of the barriers to using blinding in in vivo experiments and suggestions for improvement.</name><description>In animal experiments, blinding (also known as masking) is a methodological strategy to reduce the risk that scientists, animal care staff, or other staff involved in the research may consciously or subconsciously influence the outcome. Lack of masking has been shown to correlate with an overestimation of treatment efficacy and false positive findings. We conducted exploratory interviews across academic and a commercial setting to discuss the implementation of masking at four stages of the experiment: during allocation and intervention, during the conduct of the experiment, during the outcome assessment, and during the data analysis. The objective was to explore the awareness, engagement, perceptions, and the barriers to implementing masking in animal experiments. We conducted multiple int</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Nov</publication><modification>2025-04-25T17:04:03.467Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T04:59:31.707Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9714947</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36395326</pubmed><doi>10.1371/journal.pbio.3001873</doi></cross_references></HashMap>