<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>13</volume><submitter>Zhao J</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Early diagnosis of HIV-1 infection and immediate initiation of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) are important for achieving better virological suppression and quicker immune reconstitution. However, no serological HIV-1 recency testing assay has been approved for clinical use, and the real-world clinical outcomes remain to be explored for the subjects with HIV-1 recent infection (RI) or long-term infection (LI) when antiretroviral therapy is initiated. In this study, a HIV-1 rapid recent-infection testing strip (RRITS) was developed and incorporated into the recent infection testing algorithms (RITAs) to distinguish HIV-1 RI and LI and to assess their clinical outcomes including virological response, the recovery of CD4&lt;sup>+&lt;/sup> T-cell count and CD4/CD8 ratio and the probability of survival. We found that the concordance between our RRITS and the commercially available LAg-Avidity EIA was 97.13% and 90.63% when detecting the longitudinal and cross-sectional HIV-1 positive samples, respectively. Among the 200 HIV-1 patients analyzed, 22.5% (45/200) of them were RI patients and 77.5% (155/200) were chronically infected and 30% (60/200) of them were AIDS patients. After cART, 4.1% (5/155) of the LI patients showed virological rebound, but none in the RI group. The proportion of CD4&lt;sup>+&lt;/sup> T-cell count >500 cells/mm&lt;sup>3&lt;/sup> was significantly higher in RI patients than in LI after 2 years of cART with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.6 (95% CI: 1.9, 3.6, &lt;i>p&lt;/i> &lt; 0.0001) while the probability of CD4/CD8 = 1 was higher in RI than in LI group with a HR of 3.6 (95% CI: 2.2, 5.7, &lt;i>p&lt;/i> &lt; 0.0001). Furthermore, the immunological recovery speed was 16 cells/mm&lt;sup>3&lt;/sup>/month for CD4&lt;sup>+&lt;/sup> T-cell and 0.043/month for the ratio of CD4/CD8 in the RI group, and was bigger in the RI group than in the LI patients (&lt;i>p&lt;/i> &lt; 0.05) during the 1st year of cART. The survival probability for LI patients was significantly lower than that for RI patients (&lt;i>p&lt;/i> &lt; 0.001). Our results indicated that RRITS combined with RITAs could successfully distinguish HIV-1 RI and LI patients whose clinical outcomes were significantly different after cART. The rapid HIV-1 recency test provides a feasible assay for diagnosing HIV-1 recent infection and a useful tool for predicting the outcomes of HIV-1 patients.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Frontiers in microbiology</journal><pagination>1004960</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9722761</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Evaluation of antiretroviral therapy effect and prognosis between HIV-1 recent and long-term infection based on a rapid recent infection testing algorithm.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9722761</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Shui J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tang S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wan Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu Q</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yu T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhao J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Peng J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Evaluation of antiretroviral therapy effect and prognosis between HIV-1 recent and long-term infection based on a rapid recent infection testing algorithm.</name><description>Early diagnosis of HIV-1 infection and immediate initiation of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) are important for achieving better virological suppression and quicker immune reconstitution. However, no serological HIV-1 recency testing assay has been approved for clinical use, and the real-world clinical outcomes remain to be explored for the subjects with HIV-1 recent infection (RI) or long-term infection (LI) when antiretroviral therapy is initiated. In this study, a HIV-1 rapid recent-infection testing strip (RRITS) was developed and incorporated into the recent infection testing algorithms (RITAs) to distinguish HIV-1 RI and LI and to assess their clinical outcomes including virological response, the recovery of CD4&lt;sup>+&lt;/sup> T-cell count and CD4/CD8 ratio and the probability of survival. We found that the concordance between our RRITS and the commercially available LAg-Avidity EIA was 97.13% and 90.63% when detecting the longitudinal and cross-sectional HIV-1 positive samples, respectively. Among the 200 HIV-1 patients analyzed, 22.5% (45/200) of them were RI patients and 77.5% (155/200) were chronically infected and 30% (60/200) of them were AIDS patients. After cART, 4.1% (5/155) of the LI patients showed virological rebound, but none in the RI group. The proportion of CD4&lt;sup>+&lt;/sup> T-cell count >500 cells/mm&lt;sup>3&lt;/sup> was significantly higher in RI patients than in LI after 2 years of cART with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.6 (95% CI: 1.9, 3.6, &lt;i>p&lt;/i> &lt; 0.0001) while the probability of CD4/CD8 = 1 was higher in RI than in LI group with a HR of 3.6 (95% CI: 2.2, 5.7, &lt;i>p&lt;/i> &lt; 0.0001). Furthermore, the immunological recovery speed was 16 cells/mm&lt;sup>3&lt;/sup>/month for CD4&lt;sup>+&lt;/sup> T-cell and 0.043/month for the ratio of CD4/CD8 in the RI group, and was bigger in the RI group than in the LI patients (&lt;i>p&lt;/i> &lt; 0.05) during the 1st year of cART. The survival probability for LI patients was significantly lower than that for RI patients (&lt;i>p&lt;/i> &lt; 0.001). Our results indicated that RRITS combined with RITAs could successfully distinguish HIV-1 RI and LI patients whose clinical outcomes were significantly different after cART. The rapid HIV-1 recency test provides a feasible assay for diagnosing HIV-1 recent infection and a useful tool for predicting the outcomes of HIV-1 patients.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022</publication><modification>2025-04-04T12:01:34.901Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T02:59:57.045Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9722761</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36483196</pubmed><doi>10.3389/fmicb.2022.1004960</doi></cross_references></HashMap>