{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Zhang J"],"funding":["Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program","Wu Yingkai Foundation for Medical Research and Development"],"pagination":["3275-3285"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9722815"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["407(8)"],"pubmed_abstract":["Background
Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS), an alternative to diverting stoma (DS), has been used as a \"bridge to surgery\" (BTS) to decompress acute obstruction of colorectal cancer (CRC) for decades. However, whether SEMS is a safe technique for obstruction of CRC without compromising the long-term survival of patients remains unidentified compared to those of DS. The aim of the present study was to elucidate the safety and survival outcomes of SEMS and DS.Methods
Embase, PubMed, and Medline were searched for qualified studies published until October, 2020, in which SEMS or DS was performed as a BTS without resection at the same stage. The last search was on December 5th, 2020. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of included studies. The m"],"journal":["Langenbeck's archives of surgery"],"pubmed_title":["Endoscopic stent versus diverting stoma as a bridge to surgery for obstructive colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis."],"pmcid":["PMC9722815"],"funding_grant_id":["2017JY0020","HX-H1802033"],"pubmed_authors":["Liu X","Yang W","Zhang D","Yang L","Zhang J","Jiang X","Zhu H","Zhou Z"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Endoscopic stent versus diverting stoma as a bridge to surgery for obstructive colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","description":"Background
Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS), an alternative to diverting stoma (DS), has been used as a \"bridge to surgery\" (BTS) to decompress acute obstruction of colorectal cancer (CRC) for decades. However, whether SEMS is a safe technique for obstruction of CRC without compromising the long-term survival of patients remains unidentified compared to those of DS. The aim of the present study was to elucidate the safety and survival outcomes of SEMS and DS.Methods
Embase, PubMed, and Medline were searched for qualified studies published until October, 2020, in which SEMS or DS was performed as a BTS without resection at the same stage. The last search was on December 5th, 2020. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of included studies. The m","dates":{"release":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2022 Dec","modification":"2025-04-19T13:21:50.084Z","creation":"2025-04-19T13:21:50.084Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC9722815","cross_references":{"pubmed":["35666309"],"doi":["10.1007/s00423-022-02517-5"]}}