<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Zhang J</submitter><funding>Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program</funding><funding>Wu Yingkai Foundation for Medical Research and Development</funding><pagination>3275-3285</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9722815</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>407(8)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS), an alternative to diverting stoma (DS), has been used as a "bridge to surgery" (BTS) to decompress acute obstruction of colorectal cancer (CRC) for decades. However, whether SEMS is a safe technique for obstruction of CRC without compromising the long-term survival of patients remains unidentified compared to those of DS. The aim of the present study was to elucidate the safety and survival outcomes of SEMS and DS.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Embase, PubMed, and Medline were searched for qualified studies published until October, 2020, in which SEMS or DS was performed as a BTS without resection at the same stage. The last search was on December 5th, 2020. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of included studies. The m</pubmed_abstract><journal>Langenbeck's archives of surgery</journal><pubmed_title>Endoscopic stent versus diverting stoma as a bridge to surgery for obstructive colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9722815</pmcid><funding_grant_id>2017JY0020</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>HX-H1802033</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Liu X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yang W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yang L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jiang X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhu H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhou Z</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Endoscopic stent versus diverting stoma as a bridge to surgery for obstructive colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS), an alternative to diverting stoma (DS), has been used as a "bridge to surgery" (BTS) to decompress acute obstruction of colorectal cancer (CRC) for decades. However, whether SEMS is a safe technique for obstruction of CRC without compromising the long-term survival of patients remains unidentified compared to those of DS. The aim of the present study was to elucidate the safety and survival outcomes of SEMS and DS.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Embase, PubMed, and Medline were searched for qualified studies published until October, 2020, in which SEMS or DS was performed as a BTS without resection at the same stage. The last search was on December 5th, 2020. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of included studies. The m</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Dec</publication><modification>2025-04-19T13:21:50.084Z</modification><creation>2025-04-19T13:21:50.084Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9722815</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35666309</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s00423-022-02517-5</doi></cross_references></HashMap>