<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Buccheri S</submitter><funding>Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus (SDCA)</funding><pagination>1413-1421</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9724977</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>16(17)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>The aim of this study was to assess the real-world clinical performance of a sirolimus-eluting ultrathin-strut drug-eluting stent (DES) (Orsiro) in a large nationwide cohort of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).&lt;h4>Methods and results&lt;/h4>From the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry, the two-year outcomes of 4,561 patients implanted with Orsiro (Orsiro group) and 69,570 receiving other newer-generation DES (n-DES group) were analysed. The rate of definite stent thrombosis was low in both groups (0.67% and 0.83% for Orsiro and n-DES, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-1.46, p-value 0.66). Restenosis was also infrequent (1.5% vs 2.0% with Orsiro and n-DES, adjusted HR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.63-1.03, p-value=0.09). The risk of target lesion revascularisation by PCI was lower in the Orsiro group (1.6% vs 2.3%, adjusted HR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.60-0.94, p-value=0.013). All-cause mortality and myocardial infarction did not show a statistically significant difference between the two groups (mortality of 7.5% in both groups, adjusted HR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.72-1.35, p-value=0.94; 6.0% vs 5.2% for myocardial infarction, adjusted HR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.00-1.43, p-value=0.06).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>In a nationwide scenario, the use of a sirolimus-eluting ultrathin-strut DES portended favourable clinical outcomes.</pubmed_abstract><journal>EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology</journal><pubmed_title>Clinical outcomes with unselected use of an ultrathin-strut sirolimus-eluting stent: a report from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR).</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9724977</pmcid><funding_grant_id>508</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Erlinge D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Witt N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Persson J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>James SK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bohm F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Buccheri S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yndigegn T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lagerqvist B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Frobert O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sarno G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Renlund H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Grimfjard P</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Clinical outcomes with unselected use of an ultrathin-strut sirolimus-eluting stent: a report from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR).</name><description>&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>The aim of this study was to assess the real-world clinical performance of a sirolimus-eluting ultrathin-strut drug-eluting stent (DES) (Orsiro) in a large nationwide cohort of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).&lt;h4>Methods and results&lt;/h4>From the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry, the two-year outcomes of 4,561 patients implanted with Orsiro (Orsiro group) and 69,570 receiving other newer-generation DES (n-DES group) were analysed. The rate of definite stent thrombosis was low in both groups (0.67% and 0.83% for Orsiro and n-DES, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-1.46, p-value 0.66). Restenosis was also infrequent (1.5% vs 2.0% with Orsiro and n-DES, adjusted HR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.63-1.03, p-value=0.09). The risk of target lesion revascularisation by PCI was lower in the Orsiro group (1.6% vs 2.3%, adjusted HR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.60-0.94, p-value=0.013). All-cause mortality and myocardial infarction did not show a statistically significant difference between the two groups (mortality of 7.5% in both groups, adjusted HR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.72-1.35, p-value=0.94; 6.0% vs 5.2% for myocardial infarction, adjusted HR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.00-1.43, p-value=0.06).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>In a nationwide scenario, the use of a sirolimus-eluting ultrathin-strut DES portended favourable clinical outcomes.</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Apr</publication><modification>2025-04-05T11:31:35.816Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T11:31:35.816Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9724977</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33016880</pubmed><doi>10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00429</doi><doi>10.4244/eij-d-20-00429</doi></cross_references></HashMap>