<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>13</volume><submitter>Wang Z</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>&lt;i>Epichloë bromicola&lt;/i> is a cultivable fungal endophyte that lives in symbiosis with wild barley (&lt;i>Hordeum brevisubulatum&lt;/i>) to which it confers salt tolerance. This study tested the hypothesis that &lt;i>E. bromicola&lt;/i> derived from wild barley has the potential to increase salt tolerance in cultivated barley under salt stress.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>To test this hypothesis, the growth response, physiological parameters, and metabolic profiles of barley plants inoculated with &lt;i>E. bromicola&lt;/i> (E+) and those not inoculated with &lt;i>E. bromicola&lt;/i> (E-) were compared under salt stress.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Compared with E- barley plants, E+ barley plants had significantly increased plant height, shoot biomass, total biomass, chlorophyll content, osmotic synthesis, and accumulation of stress adaptation metabolites. &lt;i>E. bromicola&lt;/i> increased the salt stress tolerance of cultivated barley, and the positive effects correlated with different salt stress conditions.&lt;h4>Discussion&lt;/h4>These results suggest that &lt;i>E. bromicola&lt;/i> has promising potential for enhancing the salt tolerance of barley. New insights into the mechanisms underlying this barley-fungal endophyte association are provided, and interesting questions regarding the role of &lt;i>E. bromicola&lt;/i> in fungus-enhanced tolerance to salt stress in this symbiosis are raised.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Frontiers in microbiology</journal><pagination>1044735</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9730248</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>&lt;i>Epichloe bromicola&lt;/i> from wild barley improves salt-tolerance of cultivated barley by altering physiological responses to salt stress.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9730248</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Liu J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>White JF</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>&lt;i>Epichloe bromicola&lt;/i> from wild barley improves salt-tolerance of cultivated barley by altering physiological responses to salt stress.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>&lt;i>Epichloë bromicola&lt;/i> is a cultivable fungal endophyte that lives in symbiosis with wild barley (&lt;i>Hordeum brevisubulatum&lt;/i>) to which it confers salt tolerance. This study tested the hypothesis that &lt;i>E. bromicola&lt;/i> derived from wild barley has the potential to increase salt tolerance in cultivated barley under salt stress.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>To test this hypothesis, the growth response, physiological parameters, and metabolic profiles of barley plants inoculated with &lt;i>E. bromicola&lt;/i> (E+) and those not inoculated with &lt;i>E. bromicola&lt;/i> (E-) were compared under salt stress.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Compared with E- barley plants, E+ barley plants had significantly increased plant height, shoot biomass, total biomass, chlorophyll content, osmotic synthesis, and accumulation of stress adaptation metabolites. &lt;i>E. bromicola&lt;/i> increased the salt stress tolerance of cultivated barley, and the positive effects correlated with different salt stress conditions.&lt;h4>Discussion&lt;/h4>These results suggest that &lt;i>E. bromicola&lt;/i> has promising potential for enhancing the salt tolerance of barley. New insights into the mechanisms underlying this barley-fungal endophyte association are provided, and interesting questions regarding the role of &lt;i>E. bromicola&lt;/i> in fungus-enhanced tolerance to salt stress in this symbiosis are raised.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022</publication><modification>2025-04-04T12:01:20.59Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T02:59:58.316Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9730248</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36504776</pubmed><doi>10.3389/fmicb.2022.1044735</doi></cross_references></HashMap>