<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Yin J</submitter><funding>Science and Technology Bureau of Kaifeng</funding><funding>Science and Technology Department of Henan Province</funding><pagination>2119763</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9746490</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>18(6)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Patients with solid cancer have an increased risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and associated mortality than the general population. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the currently available evidence about the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with solid cancer. We included prospective studies comparing the immunogenicity and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines between patients with solid cancer and healthy individuals. Relative risks of seroconversion after the first and second dose of a COVID-19 vaccine were separately pooled with the use of random effects meta-analysis. Thirty studies with 11,245 subjects met the inclusion criteria. After first vaccine dose, the pooled RR of seroconversion in patients with solid cancer &lt;i>vs&lt;/i> healthy individuals was 0.54 (95% CI 0.38-0.78, &lt;i>I&lt;/i>&lt;sup>&lt;i>2&lt;/i>&lt;/sup> = 94%). After a second dose, the pooled RR of seroconversion in patients with solid cancer &lt;i>vs&lt;/i> healthy controls was 0.87 (0.86-0.88, &lt;i>I&lt;/i>&lt;sup>&lt;i>2&lt;/i>&lt;/sup> = 87%). Our review suggests that, compared with healthy individuals, COVID-19 vaccines show favorable immunogenicity and efficacy in patients with solid cancer. A second dose is associated with significantly improved seroconversion, although it is slightly lower in patients with solid cancer compared with healthy individuals.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Human vaccines &amp; immunotherapeutics</journal><pubmed_title>Seroconversion rate after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with solid cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9746490</pmcid><funding_grant_id>112102310306</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>119</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Li Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yin J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Seroconversion rate after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with solid cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.</name><description>Patients with solid cancer have an increased risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and associated mortality than the general population. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the currently available evidence about the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with solid cancer. We included prospective studies comparing the immunogenicity and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines between patients with solid cancer and healthy individuals. Relative risks of seroconversion after the first and second dose of a COVID-19 vaccine were separately pooled with the use of random effects meta-analysis. Thirty studies with 11,245 subjects met the inclusion criteria. After first vaccine dose, the pooled RR of seroconversion in patients with solid cancer &lt;i>vs&lt;/i> healthy individuals was 0.54 (95% CI 0.38-0.78, &lt;i>I&lt;/i>&lt;sup>&lt;i>2&lt;/i>&lt;/sup> = 94%). After a second dose, the pooled RR of seroconversion in patients with solid cancer &lt;i>vs&lt;/i> healthy controls was 0.87 (0.86-0.88, &lt;i>I&lt;/i>&lt;sup>&lt;i>2&lt;/i>&lt;/sup> = 87%). Our review suggests that, compared with healthy individuals, COVID-19 vaccines show favorable immunogenicity and efficacy in patients with solid cancer. A second dose is associated with significantly improved seroconversion, although it is slightly lower in patients with solid cancer compared with healthy individuals.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Nov</publication><modification>2026-06-20T03:18:01.777Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T19:11:16.335Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9746490</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36161976</pubmed><doi>10.1080/21645515.2022.2119763</doi></cross_references></HashMap>