{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["28(45)"],"submitter":["Zhang XQ"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background</h4>The optimal method to remove sessile colorectal lesions sized 10-20 mm remains uncertain. Piecemeal and incomplete resection are major limitations in current practice, such as endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and cold or hot snare polypectomy. Recently, EMR with circumferential precutting (EMR-P) has emerged as an effective technique, but the quality of current evidence in comparative studies of conventional EMR (CEMR) and EMR-P is limited.<h4>Aim</h4>To investigate whether EMR-P is superior to CEMR in removing sessile colorectal polyps.<h4>Methods</h4>This multicenter randomized controlled trial involved seven medical institutions in China. Patients with colorectal polyps sized 10-20 mm were enrolled and randomly assigned to undergo EMR-P or CEMR. EMR-P was performed "],"journal":["World journal of gastroenterology"],"pagination":["6397-6409"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9753056"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting <i>vs</i> conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps sized 10-20 mm."],"pmcid":["PMC9753056"],"pubmed_authors":["Xu L","Sang JZ","Yu CH","Mao XL","Zhang XQ","Li B","Zhu WL","Yang XY"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting <i>vs</i> conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps sized 10-20 mm.","description":"<h4>Background</h4>The optimal method to remove sessile colorectal lesions sized 10-20 mm remains uncertain. Piecemeal and incomplete resection are major limitations in current practice, such as endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and cold or hot snare polypectomy. Recently, EMR with circumferential precutting (EMR-P) has emerged as an effective technique, but the quality of current evidence in comparative studies of conventional EMR (CEMR) and EMR-P is limited.<h4>Aim</h4>To investigate whether EMR-P is superior to CEMR in removing sessile colorectal polyps.<h4>Methods</h4>This multicenter randomized controlled trial involved seven medical institutions in China. Patients with colorectal polyps sized 10-20 mm were enrolled and randomly assigned to undergo EMR-P or CEMR. EMR-P was performed ","dates":{"release":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2022 Dec","modification":"2025-04-19T22:44:55.591Z","creation":"2025-04-19T22:44:55.591Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC9753056","cross_references":{"pubmed":["36533110"],"doi":["10.3748/wjg.v28.i45.6397"]}}