<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>28(45)</volume><submitter>Zhang XQ</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The optimal method to remove sessile colorectal lesions sized 10-20 mm remains uncertain. Piecemeal and incomplete resection are major limitations in current practice, such as endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and cold or hot snare polypectomy. Recently, EMR with circumferential precutting (EMR-P) has emerged as an effective technique, but the quality of current evidence in comparative studies of conventional EMR (CEMR) and EMR-P is limited.&lt;h4>Aim&lt;/h4>To investigate whether EMR-P is superior to CEMR in removing sessile colorectal polyps.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This multicenter randomized controlled trial involved seven medical institutions in China. Patients with colorectal polyps sized 10-20 mm were enrolled and randomly assigned to undergo EMR-P or CEMR. EMR-P was performed </pubmed_abstract><journal>World journal of gastroenterology</journal><pagination>6397-6409</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9753056</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting &lt;i>vs&lt;/i> conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps sized 10-20 mm.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9753056</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Xu L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sang JZ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yu CH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mao XL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang XQ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhu WL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yang XY</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting &lt;i>vs&lt;/i> conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps sized 10-20 mm.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The optimal method to remove sessile colorectal lesions sized 10-20 mm remains uncertain. Piecemeal and incomplete resection are major limitations in current practice, such as endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and cold or hot snare polypectomy. Recently, EMR with circumferential precutting (EMR-P) has emerged as an effective technique, but the quality of current evidence in comparative studies of conventional EMR (CEMR) and EMR-P is limited.&lt;h4>Aim&lt;/h4>To investigate whether EMR-P is superior to CEMR in removing sessile colorectal polyps.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This multicenter randomized controlled trial involved seven medical institutions in China. Patients with colorectal polyps sized 10-20 mm were enrolled and randomly assigned to undergo EMR-P or CEMR. EMR-P was performed </description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Dec</publication><modification>2025-04-19T22:44:55.591Z</modification><creation>2025-04-19T22:44:55.591Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9753056</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36533110</pubmed><doi>10.3748/wjg.v28.i45.6397</doi></cross_references></HashMap>