<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>79(2)</volume><submitter>Inokuma Y</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Erroneous reports of adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) likely exacerbated the 2013 collapse of Japan's HPV immunization program. A similar phenomenon characterized the first months of COVID-19 immunization programs in the USA, UK, and Japan with high rates of reported anaphylaxis. These reports illustrate the susceptibility of supposedly objective medical judgments to public anxiety.&lt;h4>Purpose and methods&lt;/h4>This study documents inaccuracies in reported AEFIs using three quantitative methods.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>One of these quantitative methods revealed that false-positive rates for anaphylaxis reports following HPV and later COVID-19 vaccination ranged from 74 to 91 percent. However, unlike HPV vaccinations in Japan, anaphylaxis reports following COVID-19 va</pubmed_abstract><journal>European journal of clinical pharmacology</journal><pagination>269-278</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9759036</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Imprecision in adverse event reports following immunization against HPV in Japan and COVID-19 in the USA, UK, and Japan-and the effects of vaccine hesitancy and government policy.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9759036</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Kneller R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Inokuma Y</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Imprecision in adverse event reports following immunization against HPV in Japan and COVID-19 in the USA, UK, and Japan-and the effects of vaccine hesitancy and government policy.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Erroneous reports of adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) likely exacerbated the 2013 collapse of Japan's HPV immunization program. A similar phenomenon characterized the first months of COVID-19 immunization programs in the USA, UK, and Japan with high rates of reported anaphylaxis. These reports illustrate the susceptibility of supposedly objective medical judgments to public anxiety.&lt;h4>Purpose and methods&lt;/h4>This study documents inaccuracies in reported AEFIs using three quantitative methods.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>One of these quantitative methods revealed that false-positive rates for anaphylaxis reports following HPV and later COVID-19 vaccination ranged from 74 to 91 percent. However, unlike HPV vaccinations in Japan, anaphylaxis reports following COVID-19 va</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Feb</publication><modification>2025-08-30T03:12:09.038Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T10:06:33.142Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9759036</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36527455</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s00228-022-03412-0</doi></cross_references></HashMap>