<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>17(1)</volume><submitter>Jalava MP</submitter><funding>The Finnish Cultural Foundation</funding><funding>The Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Turku</funding><funding>The Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Patients with severe aortic stenosis and left ventricular systolic dysfunction have a poor prognosis, and this may result in inferior survival also after aortic valve replacement. The outcomes of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement were investigated in this comparative analysis.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>The retrospective nationwide FinnValve registry included data on patients who underwent transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthesis for severe aortic stenosis. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust the outcomes for baseline covariates of patients with reduced (≤ 50%) left ventricular ejection fraction.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Within the unselected, consecutive 6463 patients included in the registry, the prevalence of reduced ejection fraction was 20.8% (876 patients) in the surgical cohort and 27.7% (452 patients) in the transcatheter cohort. Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction was associated with decreased survival (adjusted hazards ratio 1.215, 95%CI 1.067-1.385) after a mean follow-up of 3.6 years. Among 255 propensity score matched pairs, 30-day mortality was 3.1% after transcatheter and 7.8% after surgical intervention (p = 0.038). One-year and 4-year survival were 87.5% and 65.9% after transcatheter intervention and 83.9% and 69.6% after surgical intervention (restricted mean survival time ratio, 1.002, 95%CI 0.929-1.080, p = 0.964), respectively.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction was associated with increased morbidity and mortality after surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Thirty-day mortality was higher after surgery, but intermediate-term survival was comparable to transcatheter intervention. Trial registration The FinnValve registry ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03385915.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of cardiothoracic surgery</journal><pagination>322</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9759878</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9759878</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Jalava MP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dahlbacka S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Makikallio T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Virtanen M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Laine M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Valtola A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rosato S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Anttila V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Niemela M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Airaksinen J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maaranen P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Savontaus M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Raivio P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kinnunen E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ahvenvaara T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Husso A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Biancari F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Eskola M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>D'Errigo P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Laakso T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tauriainen T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jaakkola J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Juvonen T</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Patients with severe aortic stenosis and left ventricular systolic dysfunction have a poor prognosis, and this may result in inferior survival also after aortic valve replacement. The outcomes of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement were investigated in this comparative analysis.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>The retrospective nationwide FinnValve registry included data on patients who underwent transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthesis for severe aortic stenosis. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust the outcomes for baseline covariates of patients with reduced (≤ 50%) left ventricular ejection fraction.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Within the unselected, consecutive 6463 patients included in the registry, the prevalence of reduced ejection fraction was 20.8% (876 patients) in the surgical cohort and 27.7% (452 patients) in the transcatheter cohort. Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction was associated with decreased survival (adjusted hazards ratio 1.215, 95%CI 1.067-1.385) after a mean follow-up of 3.6 years. Among 255 propensity score matched pairs, 30-day mortality was 3.1% after transcatheter and 7.8% after surgical intervention (p = 0.038). One-year and 4-year survival were 87.5% and 65.9% after transcatheter intervention and 83.9% and 69.6% after surgical intervention (restricted mean survival time ratio, 1.002, 95%CI 0.929-1.080, p = 0.964), respectively.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction was associated with increased morbidity and mortality after surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Thirty-day mortality was higher after surgery, but intermediate-term survival was comparable to transcatheter intervention. Trial registration The FinnValve registry ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03385915.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Dec</publication><modification>2026-05-28T21:27:06.611Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T01:55:34.972Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9759878</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36529781</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s13019-022-02061-9</doi></cross_references></HashMap>