<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Yamaura R</submitter><funding>Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare</funding><pagination>100229</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9761254</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>4(4)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To describe characteristics of patient with severe stroke (FIM motor score [FIM motor] 20-49 at admission) and examine association between pre-specified factors (age, sex, modified Rankin Scale before stroke onset, body mass index, FIM motor, and FIM cognitive) and time to achieve FIM motor ≥70, that is, self-independent level.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Retrospective cohort study using a large database in Japan.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>Rehabilitation wards.&lt;h4>Participants&lt;/h4>Patients with severe stroke (N=1422) who received inpatient rehabilitation were included (median age: 76 years; interquartile range [IQR]: 68.0-84.0). A total of 54.6% were men, and 65.8% were ischemic stroke.&lt;h4>Interventions&lt;/h4>Not applicable.&lt;h4>Main outcome measures&lt;/h4>Time to achieve FIM motor ≥70.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>After inpatient rehabilitation, 40.4% (N=575) achieved FIM motor ≥70 (admission FIM motor 20-29, 30-39 and 40-49: 18.6%, 33.6%, and 47.8%, respectively). Patients who achieved FIM motor ≥70 stayed median 81.0 days [IQR, 51.0-120.0]) and received median: 6.94 units per day [IQR, 5.48-7.78], 1 unit=20 minutes). Adjusted Fine-Gray regression revealed that shorter time to achieve FIM motor ≥70 was associated with higher admission FIM motor (hazard ratio [HR] 2.87 [95% confidence interval [CI] 2.27-3.62]: 20-29 vs 40-49), higher admission FIM cognitive (HR 1.81 [95% CI: 1.39-2.35]: 5-14 vs 25-35), and younger (HR 3.20 [95% CI: 2.32-4.42]: ≥85 years vs 20-69 years).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Most patients with severe stroke did not achieve FIM motor ≥70 after inpatient rehabilitation. Older patients and patients with lower admission FIM motor require more attention. They should be prioritized for state-of-the-art rehabilitation therapy.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation</journal><pubmed_title>Factors Associated With Time to Achieve Physical Functional Recovery in Patients With Severe Stoke After Inpatient Rehabilitation: A Retrospective Nationwide Cohort Study in Japan.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9761254</pmcid><funding_grant_id>H30-Policy-Designated-004</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Fushimi K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yamaura R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ikeda S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ishikawa KB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kaneko T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yamazaki T</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Factors Associated With Time to Achieve Physical Functional Recovery in Patients With Severe Stoke After Inpatient Rehabilitation: A Retrospective Nationwide Cohort Study in Japan.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To describe characteristics of patient with severe stroke (FIM motor score [FIM motor] 20-49 at admission) and examine association between pre-specified factors (age, sex, modified Rankin Scale before stroke onset, body mass index, FIM motor, and FIM cognitive) and time to achieve FIM motor ≥70, that is, self-independent level.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Retrospective cohort study using a large database in Japan.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>Rehabilitation wards.&lt;h4>Participants&lt;/h4>Patients with severe stroke (N=1422) who received inpatient rehabilitation were included (median age: 76 years; interquartile range [IQR]: 68.0-84.0). A total of 54.6% were men, and 65.8% were ischemic stroke.&lt;h4>Interventions&lt;/h4>Not applicable.&lt;h4>Main outcome measures&lt;/h4>Time to achieve FIM motor ≥70.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>After inpatient rehabilitation, 40.4% (N=575) achieved FIM motor ≥70 (admission FIM motor 20-29, 30-39 and 40-49: 18.6%, 33.6%, and 47.8%, respectively). Patients who achieved FIM motor ≥70 stayed median 81.0 days [IQR, 51.0-120.0]) and received median: 6.94 units per day [IQR, 5.48-7.78], 1 unit=20 minutes). Adjusted Fine-Gray regression revealed that shorter time to achieve FIM motor ≥70 was associated with higher admission FIM motor (hazard ratio [HR] 2.87 [95% confidence interval [CI] 2.27-3.62]: 20-29 vs 40-49), higher admission FIM cognitive (HR 1.81 [95% CI: 1.39-2.35]: 5-14 vs 25-35), and younger (HR 3.20 [95% CI: 2.32-4.42]: ≥85 years vs 20-69 years).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Most patients with severe stroke did not achieve FIM motor ≥70 after inpatient rehabilitation. Older patients and patients with lower admission FIM motor require more attention. They should be prioritized for state-of-the-art rehabilitation therapy.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Dec</publication><modification>2024-12-04T03:19:18.78Z</modification><creation>2024-12-04T03:19:18.78Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9761254</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36545532</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100229</doi></cross_references></HashMap>