{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["McIntosh M"],"funding":["Instituto Nacional de Cancerología","NCI NIH HHS"],"pagination":["e13697"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9786728"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["31(6)"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Objective</h4>Individuals diagnosed with low risk, localised prostate cancer (PCa) face a difficult decision between active surveillance (AS) and definitive treatment. We aimed to explore perceived influences on treatment decision-making from the patient and partner's perspectives.<h4>Methods</h4>Patients (and partners) who met AS criteria and had chosen their treatment were recruited. Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted via telephone to explore experiences of diagnosis, impact on patient lifestyle, experiences with physicians, treatment preferences/choice, treatment information understanding and needs, and overall decision-making process. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis.<h4>Results</h4>Twenty-four ma"],"journal":["European journal of cancer care"],"pubmed_title":["Social ecological influences on treatment decision-making in men diagnosed with low risk, localised prostate cancer."],"pmcid":["PMC9786728"],"funding_grant_id":["R21-CA164807","R21‐CA164807","R21 CA164807"],"pubmed_authors":["Tutino R","Nelson C","Opozda MJ","Galvao DA","Short CE","Ehdaie B","McIntosh M","Diefenbach M"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Social ecological influences on treatment decision-making in men diagnosed with low risk, localised prostate cancer.","description":"<h4>Objective</h4>Individuals diagnosed with low risk, localised prostate cancer (PCa) face a difficult decision between active surveillance (AS) and definitive treatment. We aimed to explore perceived influences on treatment decision-making from the patient and partner's perspectives.<h4>Methods</h4>Patients (and partners) who met AS criteria and had chosen their treatment were recruited. Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted via telephone to explore experiences of diagnosis, impact on patient lifestyle, experiences with physicians, treatment preferences/choice, treatment information understanding and needs, and overall decision-making process. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis.<h4>Results</h4>Twenty-four ma","dates":{"release":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2022 Nov","modification":"2025-04-04T12:10:12.172Z","creation":"2025-04-04T12:10:12.172Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC9786728","cross_references":{"pubmed":["36138320"],"doi":["10.1111/ecc.13697"]}}