<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>McIntosh M</submitter><funding>Instituto Nacional de Cancerología</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><pagination>e13697</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9786728</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>31(6)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Individuals diagnosed with low risk, localised prostate cancer (PCa) face a difficult decision between active surveillance (AS) and definitive treatment. We aimed to explore perceived influences on treatment decision-making from the patient and partner's perspectives.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Patients (and partners) who met AS criteria and had chosen their treatment were recruited. Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted via telephone to explore experiences of diagnosis, impact on patient lifestyle, experiences with physicians, treatment preferences/choice, treatment information understanding and needs, and overall decision-making process. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Twenty-four ma</pubmed_abstract><journal>European journal of cancer care</journal><pubmed_title>Social ecological influences on treatment decision-making in men diagnosed with low risk, localised prostate cancer.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9786728</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R21-CA164807</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R21‐CA164807</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R21 CA164807</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Tutino R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nelson C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Opozda MJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Galvao DA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Short CE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ehdaie B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McIntosh M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Diefenbach M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Social ecological influences on treatment decision-making in men diagnosed with low risk, localised prostate cancer.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Individuals diagnosed with low risk, localised prostate cancer (PCa) face a difficult decision between active surveillance (AS) and definitive treatment. We aimed to explore perceived influences on treatment decision-making from the patient and partner's perspectives.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Patients (and partners) who met AS criteria and had chosen their treatment were recruited. Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted via telephone to explore experiences of diagnosis, impact on patient lifestyle, experiences with physicians, treatment preferences/choice, treatment information understanding and needs, and overall decision-making process. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Twenty-four ma</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Nov</publication><modification>2025-04-04T12:10:12.172Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T12:10:12.172Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9786728</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36138320</pubmed><doi>10.1111/ecc.13697</doi></cross_references></HashMap>